Commentary on 'Exclusion rates in randomized trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review'.
作者信息
Ugalde Anna, Kiss Nicole, Livingston Patricia M, Rankin Nicole
机构信息
School of Nursing and Midwifery and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Geelong, Australia.
出版信息
Trials. 2021 Jan 21;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05019-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary on 'Exclusion rates in randomized trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review'.关于“身体疾病治疗随机试验中的排除率：一项系统评价”的评论
Trials. 2021 Jan 21;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05019-9.
2
Exclusion rates in randomized controlled trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review.随机对照试验中治疗身体状况的排除率：系统评价。
Trials. 2020 Feb 26;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4139-0.
3
Commentary 'Prediction of absolute bioavailability for drugs using oral and renal clearance following a single oral dose: a critical review' (I. Mahmood).述评《单剂量口服给药后利用口服和肾脏清除率预测药物的绝对生物利用度：批判性综述》（I. 马哈茂德）
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1997 Dec;18(9):821-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-081x(199712)18:9<821::aid-bdd61>3.0.co;2-#.
4
Response to letter to the editor: 'Physical examination tests for screening and diagnosis of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review'.对编辑来信的回复：“用于筛查和诊断颈源性头痛的体格检查：一项系统评价”
Man Ther. 2016 Jun;23:e9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a case for 'judicial review'.超越随机对照试验：“司法审查”的一个案例
Health Educ Res. 1997 Jun;12(2):i-iv. doi: 10.1093/her/12.2.161.
6
Comment on 'Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review'.关于《肛瘘的外科治疗：系统评价》的述评
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jan;11(1):105; author reply 105. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01637.x. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
7
Representation of older adults in randomized controlled trials on systemic treatment in plaque psoriasis: A systematic review.随机对照试验中系统性治疗斑块状银屑病中老年人的代表性：系统评价。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Aug;83(2):412-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.079. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Description of interventions is under-reported in physical therapy clinical trials.物理治疗临床试验中干预措施的描述报道不足。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 19.
9
Inclusion and exclusion criteria used in non-specific low back pain trials: a review of randomised controlled trials published between 2006 and 2012.非特异性腰痛试验中使用的纳入和排除标准：对2006年至2012年发表的随机对照试验的综述
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 12;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2034-6.
10
Evaluation of screening strategies for improving oral cancer mortality: a Cochrane systematic review.评估改善口腔癌死亡率的筛查策略：一项Cochrane系统评价。
J Dent Educ. 2005 Feb;69(2):255-65.
引用本文的文献
1
Real-world effectiveness and persistence of reference etanercept versus biosimilar etanercept GP2015 among rheumatoid arthritis patients: A cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者中参比依那西普与生物类似药依那西普GP2015的真实世界有效性和持久性：一项队列研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 3;13:980832. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.980832. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical trial recruiters' experiences working with trial eligibility criteria: results of an exploratory, cross-sectional, online survey in the UK.临床试验招募者在工作中对试验入选标准的体验：英国一项探索性、横断面、在线调查的结果。
Trials. 2021 Oct 24;22(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05723-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Exclusion rates in randomized controlled trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review.随机对照试验中治疗身体状况的排除率：系统评价。
Trials. 2020 Feb 26;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4139-0.
2
The Elusive Search for Success: Defining and Measuring Implementation Outcomes in a Real-World Hospital Trial.对成功的难以捉摸的探寻：在一项真实世界医院试验中定义和衡量实施结果
Front Public Health. 2019 Oct 18;7:293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00293. eCollection 2019.
3
A systematic review of cancer caregiver interventions: Appraising the potential for implementation of evidence into practice.癌症照顾者干预措施的系统评价：评估将证据应用于实践的潜力。
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):687-701. doi: 10.1002/pon.5018. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.患者和工作人员作为医疗服务的共同设计者。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714.
5
Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them.实用措施：它们是什么以及我们为什么需要它们。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.010.
6
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.实施研究的结果：概念区别、测量挑战和研究议程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
7
A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how.关于预试验的教程：是什么、为什么以及怎么做。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
8
Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations.将研究成果转化为实践的实用临床试验：设计与测量建议
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):551-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163645.41407.09.
9
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".随机对照试验的外部效度：“该试验结果适用于谁？”
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
Zotero 插件