Nittu George, Bhavana Pudupet Madhavan, Shameer Thekke Thumbath, Ramakrishnan Balasundaram, Archana Rajan, Kaushal Krishan Kumar, Khedkar Gulab Dattarao, Mohan Govindarajan, Jyothi Manikkiri, Sanil Raveendranathanpillai
Molecular Biodiversity Lab, Department of Zoology & Wildlife Biology, Government Arts College, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, 643002, India.
Mudumalai Tiger Conservation Foundation, Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mol Biol Rep. 2021 Feb;48(2):1667-1676. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06139-w. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Accurate species and sex identification of non-invasive and forensic samples of the tiger and leopard is still confusing when using the allele-specific methods. We designed allele-specific methods with penultimate nucleotide mismatch in a nested manner for the exact identification and double-checking of forensic samples. The mismatch design is a novel concept in species and sex identification, making the allele-specific targeting precise. We developed three sets of markers, a 365 bp outer and a 98 bp inner marker for nested tiger species identification assay, 136 bp leopard specific marker, and carnivore sex identification markers. We validated the method with tissue/blood forensic samples of various felids and herbivorous available in our lab and on known fecal samples from Vandalur Zoo. We also collected 37 scat samples at diverse stages of deterioration from the Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India. The 365 bp targeted markers resulted in 70.2% (n = 22; 22/37) amplification success, while the 98 bp FAM-labelled marker amplified 89% (n = 33; 33/37) scat samples independently. The 136 bp leopard markers answered four scat samples (11%) unrequited by the tiger specific markers. We evaluated species and the sex identification with these markers in another 190 non-invasive samples provided by the Mudumalai Tiger Reserve authorities. Among which 56.3% (n = 107) of samples were recognized as tiger (64 male and 43 female) and 38.9% (n = 74) as leopard (41 male and 33 female). The method supersedes any other previous methods in this regard by its high accuracy and simplicity.
在使用等位基因特异性方法时,对老虎和豹的非侵入性及法医样本进行准确的物种和性别鉴定仍然存在困惑。我们设计了一种倒数第二个核苷酸错配的嵌套式等位基因特异性方法,用于法医样本的精确鉴定和双重检查。错配设计是物种和性别鉴定中的一个新概念,使等位基因特异性靶向更加精确。我们开发了三组标记物,用于嵌套式老虎物种鉴定分析的365 bp外部标记物和98 bp内部标记物、136 bp豹特异性标记物以及食肉动物性别鉴定标记物。我们使用实验室中现有的各种猫科动物和食草动物的组织/血液法医样本以及万德卢尔动物园已知的粪便样本对该方法进行了验证。我们还从印度泰米尔纳德邦穆杜马莱老虎保护区收集了37份处于不同降解阶段的粪便样本。365 bp靶向标记物的扩增成功率为70.2%(n = 22;22/37),而98 bp FAM标记的标记物独立扩增了89%(n = 33;33/37)的粪便样本。136 bp豹标记物鉴定出了4份(11%)未被老虎特异性标记物鉴定出的粪便样本。我们使用这些标记物对穆杜马莱老虎保护区管理部门提供的另外190份非侵入性样本进行了物种和性别鉴定评估。其中56.3%(n = 107)的样本被鉴定为老虎(64只雄性和43只雌性),38.9%(n = 74)被鉴定为豹(41只雄性和33只雌性)。该方法在这方面以其高准确性和简单性超越了以往的任何其他方法。