• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心无创性产前检测胎儿 13、18 和 21 三体的 Z 评分准确性评估。

Evaluation of the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 at a single center.

机构信息

Department of Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.

Department of Ultrasound, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2021 May;41(6):690-696. doi: 10.1002/pd.5908. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1002/pd.5908
PMID:33480032
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the correlation between Z-scores of positive noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT.

METHODS

Pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre between July 2017 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal NIPT results for confirmatory testing. Logistic regression analyses was applied to study the relationship between the Z scores and the PPV performance. The optimal cutoff values for indicating fetal common trisomies were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and then the PPV were calculated in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z-score greater than or equal to cutoff value and in patients with a Z-score between 3 and cutoff value respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 214 pregnancies with positive NIPT results for fetal common trisomies were validated by invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow up in this study. Of these, NIPT indicated trisomy 13 in 25 cases, trisomy 18 in 54 cases and trisomy 21 in 135 patients. Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (p < 0.05) between the Z-scores and true positive results for T21 and T18. For T13, the significant association was not observed (p > 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff Z-score for indicating fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 were 6.889, 7.574 and 6.612 respectively, and the corresponding area under curve were 0.706, 0.916, and 0.954. In this cohort with abnormal NIPT results, the cutoff values revealed a sensitivity of 96.8% and a specificity of 90% for indicating trisomies 21, and a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 92.6% for trisomies 18. However, probably due to the sample size, the sensitivity and specificity for indicating trisomy 13 were lower (85.7% and 61.1%) than that for trisomies 21 and 18. The PPVs in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z-score greater than or equal to cutoff value were 99.18% (121/122) for trisomy 21, 92.31% (24/26) for trisomy 18 and 46.15% (6/13) for trisomy 13. In patients with a Z-score between 3 and cutoff Z-score, the PPV of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were 30.77% (4/13), 10.71% (3/28), and 8.33% (1/12) respectively. Moreover, by classifying Z scores as 3 ≤ Z < 5, 5 ≤ Z < 10, and Z ≥ 10, the majority of Z scores were above 10 with a PPV of 99% for T21 and just 5.2% were between 3 and 5 with a PPV of 14.3%. In contrast for T18, over a third of tests had Z scores between 3 and 5. The PPV in this group is just over 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results show that the PPV performance of NIPT for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 are closely associated with Z-score. The higher the Z-score, the greater the likelihood that the aneuploidy result is correct. Our experience in evaluating the Z-score accuracy of NIPT in this study could be of use in similar work.

摘要

目的

评估阳性无创产前检测(NIPT)结果的 Z 分数与 NIPT 的阳性预测值(PPV)之间的相关性。

方法

纳入 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在广州妇女儿童医疗中心进行阳性 NIPT 结果的妊娠病例。对 NIPT 结果异常的患者进行胎儿核型分析或微阵列分析以进行确认性检测。应用逻辑回归分析研究 Z 分数与 PPV 性能之间的关系。根据接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析获得用于指示常见三体胎儿的最佳截断值,然后计算 Z 分数大于或等于截断值的阳性 NIPT 结果的妊娠和 Z 分数在 3 与截断值之间的妊娠的 PPV。

结果

在这项研究中,通过侵袭性产前诊断和随访验证了 214 例阳性胎儿常见三体 NIPT 结果。其中,NIPT 提示 25 例 13 三体、54 例 18 三体和 135 例 21 三体。逻辑回归分析显示 Z 分数与 T21 和 T18 的真阳性结果之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05)。对于 T13,未观察到显著相关性(p>0.05)。ROC 曲线分析表明,用于指示胎儿三体 13、18 和 21 的最佳截断 Z 分数分别为 6.889、7.574 和 6.612,相应的曲线下面积分别为 0.706、0.916 和 0.954。在本队列中,截断值对于指示 21 三体的敏感性为 96.8%,特异性为 90%,对于指示 18 三体的敏感性为 88.9%,特异性为 92.6%。然而,可能由于样本量较小,对于指示 13 三体的敏感性和特异性(85.7%和 61.1%)低于 21 三体和 18 三体。在 Z 分数大于或等于截断值的阳性 NIPT 结果的妊娠中,21 三体的 PPV 为 99.18%(121/122),18 三体为 92.31%(24/26),13 三体为 46.15%(6/13)。在 Z 分数在 3 与截断 Z 分数之间的患者中,21 三体、18 三体和 13 三体的 NIPT 的 PPV 分别为 30.77%(4/13)、10.71%(3/28)和 8.33%(1/12)。此外,将 Z 分数分类为 3≤Z<5、5≤Z<10 和 Z≥10,大多数 Z 分数大于 10,T21 的 PPV 为 99%,只有 5.2%在 3 到 5 之间,PPV 为 14.3%。相比之下,T18 中超过三分之一的检测 Z 分数在 3 到 5 之间。该组的 PPV 略高于 5%。

结论

本研究结果表明,NIPT 对胎儿三体 13、18 和 21 的 PPV 性能与 Z 分数密切相关。Z 分数越高,染色体非整倍体结果正确的可能性越大。本研究评估 NIPT Z 分数准确性的经验可能对类似工作有用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 at a single center.单中心无创性产前检测胎儿 13、18 和 21 三体的 Z 评分准确性评估。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 May;41(6):690-696. doi: 10.1002/pd.5908. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Comparison of the performance of NIPT and NIPT-plus for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and high Z-score increases the positive predictive value.无创产前检测(NIPT)和无创产前检测升级版(NIPT-plus)在胎儿染色体非整倍体检测性能方面的比较以及高Z值增加了阳性预测值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;167(1):273-280. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15535. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Combined fetal fraction to analyze the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21.联合胎儿分数分析非侵入性产前检测胎儿三体 13、18 和 21 的 Z 评分准确性。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Apr;40(4):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02694-8. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
Clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal served as a first-tier screening test for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy in a pilot city in China.在中国一个试点城市,非侵入性产前检测在 21 三体、18 三体、13 三体和性染色体非整倍体的一线筛查中表现出良好的临床性能。
Hum Genomics. 2020 Jun 5;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40246-020-00268-2.
5
Performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing: experience on 36,456 singleton and multiple pregnancies.基于游离细胞 DNA 测序的无创性产前检测的性能:36456 例单胎和多胎妊娠的经验。
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Mar 30;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00941-y.
6
Noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies with cell-free DNA using the IONA test: a prospective multicenter study.应用 IONA 测试的双胎妊娠游离胎儿 DNA 非侵入性产前筛查:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):79.e1-79.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Cytogenomic results following high-chance non-invasive prenatal testing: a UK national audit.高风险无创性产前检测后的细胞基因组学结果:英国国家审计。
Genet Res (Camb). 2020 Sep 1;102:e7. doi: 10.1017/S0016672320000087.
8
Prospective clinical evaluation of Momguard non-invasive prenatal test in 1011 Korean high-risk pregnant women.Momguard无创产前检测在1011名韩国高危孕妇中的前瞻性临床评估。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;40(8):1090-1095. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1680617. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
[Analysis of the factors influencing positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies].[影响染色体非整倍体无创产前检测阳性预测值的因素分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 23;102(31):2452-2457. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20211215-02802.
10
[Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with high risks by screening of fetal free DNA from peripheral blood samples].[通过外周血样本中游离胎儿DNA筛查对高危孕妇进行产前诊断及妊娠结局]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 10;41(1):1-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20221104-00757.

引用本文的文献

1
Hierarchical Classification of Factors Associated With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Failures and Its Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes.与无创产前检测失败相关因素的分层分类及其对妊娠结局的影响
Matern Fetal Med. 2024 Oct 11;6(4):215-224. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000248. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
KF-NIPT: K-mer and fetal fraction-based estimation of chromosomal anomaly from NIPT data.KF-NIPT:基于K-mer和胎儿游离DNA比例从无创产前检测数据中估计染色体异常
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 May 22;26(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06127-y.
3
Retrospective study on NIPT or NIPT plus combined with ultrasound in screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
无创产前检测(NIPT)或NIPT Plus联合超声筛查胎儿染色体异常的回顾性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97230-w.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Growth Restriction Management: A Narrative Review.人工智能在胎儿生长受限管理中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 May;53(4):825-831. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23918. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Performance analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 13, 18, and 21: A large-scale retrospective study (2018-2021).13、18和21三体综合征无创产前检测的性能分析:一项大规模回顾性研究(2018 - 2021年)
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33437. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33437. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
6
NIPT-PG: empowering non-invasive prenatal testing to learn from population genomics through an incremental pan-genomic approach.NIPT-PG:通过渐进式泛基因组方法,赋予无创产前检测从人群基因组学中学习的能力。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 May 23;25(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae266.
7
Combined fetal fraction to analyze the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21.联合胎儿分数分析非侵入性产前检测胎儿三体 13、18 和 21 的 Z 评分准确性。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Apr;40(4):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02694-8. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
8
Development and performance evaluation of an artificial intelligence algorithm using cell-free DNA fragment distance for non-invasive prenatal testing (aiD-NIPT).一种使用游离DNA片段距离进行无创产前检测的人工智能算法(aiD-NIPT)的开发与性能评估
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 29;13:999587. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.999587. eCollection 2022.
9
Combined Model-Based Prediction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening.基于模型的联合预测在无创产前筛查中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;23(23):14990. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314990.
10
A retrospective single-center analysis of prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of 626 chinese patients with positive non-invasive prenatal screening results.对626例无创产前筛查结果呈阳性的中国患者进行产前诊断及随访的回顾性单中心分析。
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 19;13:965106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.965106. eCollection 2022.