Suppr超能文献

负压治疗吻合口漏的证据:系统评价。

Evidence of negative pressure therapy for anastomotic leak: a systematic review.

机构信息

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):537-545. doi: 10.1111/ans.16581. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a devastating complication. Several new treatment options are available, endoluminal negative pressure therapy is one. The aims of this systematic review are; to report success rates and stoma closure rates following endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal AL patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception to June 2018. Search limits were; English language, humans, sample >5 and >18 years. Search terms were Endospong* OR Endo-spong* OR Endo spong* OR Endoluminal negative pressure OR Endoluninal vac* OR Vacuum assisted OR negative pressure. Combined with colon OR rectum OR colorect* AND anastomotic leak OR leak*.

RESULTS

Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. There were 334 patients. Reported success rates ranged from 60% to 100%. However, success definition varied considerably. The most widely used definition was endoscopic assessment of residual cavity size, but this also varied from 0.5 cm to 3 cm. Stoma closure rates were only reported in 11 studies and ranged from 31% to 100%. Complication rates were reported in 13 studies (65%). The most common was on-going sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Included studies suggest that 60-100% of ALs heal with endoluminal negative pressure therapy. However, results from this review need to be interpreted with caution because of the variable definition of success. A more objective assessment of success may be stoma closure but this is only reported in 60% of studies. Further studies are needed to assess the benefit of negative pressure therapy in anastomotic leaks.

摘要

背景

吻合口漏(AL)是一种破坏性的并发症。有几种新的治疗选择,其中一种是腔内负压治疗。本系统评价的目的是;报告腔内负压治疗结直肠 AL 患者吻合口漏的成功率和造口关闭率。

方法

对 MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane 和 Embase 数据库进行系统评价,检索时间为 2018 年 6 月之前。搜索限制为:英语、人类、样本>5 例且>18 岁。搜索词为 Endospong或 Endo-spong或 Endo spong或 Endoluminal negative pressure 或 Endoluninal vac或 Vacuum assisted 或 negative pressure。与结肠或直肠或 colorect联合使用,以及吻合口漏或 leak

结果

符合纳入标准的文章有 20 篇。共有 334 例患者。报告的成功率从 60%到 100%不等。然而,成功率的定义差异很大。最广泛使用的定义是内镜评估残余腔大小,但这也从 0.5 厘米到 3 厘米不等。只有 11 项研究报告了造口关闭率,范围从 31%到 100%不等。13 项研究报告了并发症发生率(65%)。最常见的是持续的脓毒症。

结论

纳入的研究表明,60-100%的 AL 可以通过腔内负压治疗治愈。然而,由于成功率的定义不同,本综述的结果需要谨慎解释。对成功率的更客观评估可能是造口关闭,但只有 60%的研究报告了这一点。需要进一步研究来评估负压治疗在吻合口漏中的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验