• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察多因素记忆问卷的因素结构。

Examining the factor structure of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):255-260. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1874995. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2021.1874995
PMID:33480308
Abstract

Many adults report memory changes as they age. The Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) measures different aspects of self-reported memory, including satisfaction with one's memory, self-appraisal of memory ability, and compensatory strategy use. This questionnaire has been extensively used for clinical and research purposes, with studies reporting differences in the factor structure (three or four factors) underlying this measure. The current study evaluates previously reported factor configurations of the MMQ using best measurement practices. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on data from 560 cognitively - normal adults, ranging in age from 50 to 90 years old. Our results demonstrate support for both 3-factor model (with Satisfaction, Ability and Strategy scales) and 4-factor model structure (with Satisfaction, Ability, Internal Strategy and External Strategy scales) of this instrument. These results harmonise the existing literature which, in separate studies using exploratory analyses, supports the validity of one model or the other. The confirmation of multiple Strategy scales will provide clinicians and researchers with additional relevant information about how older adults compensate for their memory changes, enabling a broader understanding of the experience of age-related memory change. We contextualise these results within existing research identifying conceptual differences between internal and external strategy implementation.

摘要

许多成年人随着年龄的增长会报告记忆变化。多因素记忆问卷(MMQ)测量自我报告记忆的不同方面,包括对记忆的满意度、对记忆能力的自我评价以及补偿策略的使用。该问卷已广泛用于临床和研究目的,研究报告了该测量方法的潜在因素结构(三因素或四因素)存在差异。本研究使用最佳测量实践评估了 MMQ 的先前报告的因子结构。对年龄在 50 至 90 岁之间的 560 名认知正常成年人的数据进行了验证性因素分析。我们的结果支持该工具的 3 因素模型(包括满意度、能力和策略量表)和 4 因素模型结构(包括满意度、能力、内部策略和外部策略量表)。这些结果与现有文献一致,在使用探索性分析的单独研究中,支持一种或另一种模型的有效性。对多个策略量表的确认将为临床医生和研究人员提供有关老年人如何补偿记忆变化的更多相关信息,从而更全面地了解与年龄相关的记忆变化的体验。我们在现有研究的背景下对这些结果进行了分析,确定了内部和外部策略实施之间的概念差异。

相似文献

1
Examining the factor structure of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.考察多因素记忆问卷的因素结构。
Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):255-260. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1874995. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the multifactorial memory questionnaire for adults and the elderly.成人及老年人多因素记忆问卷意大利语版本的心理测量特性。
Neurol Sci. 2016 May;37(5):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2562-5. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and metamemory across the life span: psychometric properties of the German Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ).神经精神症状和整个生命周期的元记忆:德国多因素记忆问卷(MMQ)的心理测量特性。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):4551-4565. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12402-4. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults.一种针对老年人的新型元记忆问卷的心理测量特性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):P19-27. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p19.
5
The measurement of participant-reported memory across diverse populations and settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.跨多种人群和环境的参与者报告记忆的测量:多因素记忆问卷的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Memory. 2019 Aug;27(7):931-942. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1608255. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire: a comparison of young and older adults.多因素记忆问卷:对年轻人和老年人的比较。
Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1043-1056. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2378870. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
Psychometric properties of the French version of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire for adults and the elderly.针对成年人及老年人的多因素记忆问卷法语版的心理测量特性。
Can J Aging. 2004 Winter;23(4):347-57. doi: 10.1353/cja.2005.0020.
8
Metamemory and aging: Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire for elderly.元记忆与衰老:巴西版老年人多因素记忆问卷的心理测量特性
Dement Neuropsychol. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):113-126. doi: 10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1002007.
9
Assessment of everyday memory functioning in temporal lobe epilepsy and healthy adults using the multifactorial memory questionnaire (MMQ).使用多因素记忆问卷(MMQ)评估颞叶癫痫患者和健康成年人的日常记忆功能。
Epilepsy Res. 2015 Jul;113:86-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
The association between metamemory, subjective memory complaints, mood, and well-being: the Hungarian validation of Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.元记忆、主观记忆主诉、情绪与幸福感之间的关系:多因素记忆问卷的匈牙利验证。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 14;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00469-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of minocycline on changes in affective behaviors, cognitive function, and inflammation in breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.米诺环素对化疗乳腺癌幸存者情感行为、认知功能和炎症变化的影响:一项初步随机对照试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Dec;208(3):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07457-w. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and metamemory across the life span: psychometric properties of the German Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ).神经精神症状和整个生命周期的元记忆:德国多因素记忆问卷(MMQ)的心理测量特性。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):4551-4565. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12402-4. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
The association between metamemory, subjective memory complaints, mood, and well-being: the Hungarian validation of Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire.
元记忆、主观记忆主诉、情绪与幸福感之间的关系:多因素记忆问卷的匈牙利验证。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 14;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00469-y.
4
Personalized Frequency Modulated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Associative Memory Enhancement.用于增强联想记忆的个性化调频经颅电刺激
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 2;12(4):472. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040472.