Bloom J D, Rogers J L
West J Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):231-4.
The California Supreme Court's Tarasoff decision was the seminal case in the area of the duty to protect third parties from the potential of violence from patients. Tarasoff-related issues have now spread to many jurisdictions in the country. This article will pay particular attention to the cases influencing law in Washington and Oregon and will review the clinical duty to protect others from your patients that existed before Tarasoff, as physicians were taught to work between privilege and civil commitment statutes. The California law designed to limit Tarasoff liability and the reasons why legislators should be willing to support such legislation are discussed.
加利福尼亚最高法院的塔拉索夫案裁决是保护第三方免受患者潜在暴力侵害领域的开创性案例。与塔拉索夫案相关的问题现已蔓延至美国许多司法管辖区。本文将特别关注影响华盛顿州和俄勒冈州法律的案例,并回顾在塔拉索夫案之前就存在的保护他人免受患者伤害的临床责任,因为医生们被教导要在特权和民事强制法规之间权衡行事。文中还讨论了旨在限制塔拉索夫案责任的加利福尼亚法律以及立法者愿意支持此类立法的原因。