Suppr超能文献

塔萨夫案后的保密问题。

Confidentiality after Tarasoff.

作者信息

Kagle J D, Kopels S

机构信息

University of Illinois, School of Social Work, Urbana 61801.

出版信息

Health Soc Work. 1994 Aug;19(3):217-22. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.3.217.

Abstract

Following the Tarasoff decision, many social workers believe that they have a duty to warn third parties of the danger posed to them by clients. However, a careful analysis of this decision and the cases and statutes that have followed indicates that social workers' duty under the law is circumscribed. This article describes social workers' duty under the law and outlines standards of care for assessing and responding to threats of harm. It places the duty to protect third parties into the larger context of social workers' ethical and legal obligation to protect confidentiality.

摘要

在塔拉索夫案的判决之后,许多社会工作者认为他们有责任向第三方警告客户对其构成的危险。然而,对这一判决以及随后的案例和法规进行仔细分析后发现,社会工作者在法律上的责任是有限的。本文描述了社会工作者在法律上的责任,并概述了评估和应对伤害威胁的护理标准。它将保护第三方的责任置于社会工作者保护保密信息的道德和法律义务这一更大背景之下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验