• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种巩膜固定型人工晶状体植入术的系统评价

A Systematic Review on Three Major Types of Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital & Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.

Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 Jan 19;10(4):388-396. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000369.

DOI:10.1097/APO.0000000000000369
PMID:33481393
Abstract

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review on 3 major types of scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL) implantations and conducted subgroup analyses on pediatric population and subjects with Marfan syndrome.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We performed a search in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase for English language articles with keywords "(sutured intraocular lens) OR (SFIOL) OR (sutureless intraocular lens) OR (glued intraocular lens) OR (intrascleral intraocular lens) OR (SFIOL)" through October 16, 2019. Articles reporting individual outcomes after SFIOL were included in this systematic review. Recorded outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative complications, endothelial cell changes, and intraocular lens-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 217 papers. After removing duplicated and irrelevant reports, we included 57 articles involving 2624 eyes. The mean age at operation was 51.47 ± 25.62 years. Sutured SFIOL was most commonly reported in all subjects with Marfan syndrome and 92.87% of pediatric patients. The pooled intraoperative complication rate was 6.65%. Minor anterior chamber hemorrhage was the most common intraoperative (1.92%) and postoperative complication (13.93%). Optic capture was the top intraocular lens (IOL)-related complication (4.47%). The overall mean endothelial cell loss was 8.95% at 16.77 ± 11.04 months. Overall 11.99% of SFIOLs were decentred with a mean distance of 0.49 ± 0.40 mm and a mean degree of tilt by 4.11 ± 3.03°.

CONCLUSIONS

Glued SFIOL had the fewest IOL-related complications and the lowest endothelial cell loss. Sutured SFIOL carried the highest IOL-related complications, whereas sutureless, glueless SFIOL was associated with the greatest endothelial cell loss.

摘要

目的

我们对 3 种巩膜固定型人工晶状体(SFIOL)植入物进行了系统评价,并对小儿和马凡综合征患者进行了亚组分析。

设计

系统评价。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Embase 中使用关键词“(缝合型人工晶状体)或(SFIOL)或(无缝合型人工晶状体)或(粘固型人工晶状体)或(巩膜内人工晶状体)或(SFIOL)”进行了搜索,检索时间截至 2019 年 10 月 16 日。本系统评价纳入了报道 SFIOL 术后个体结局的研究。记录的结局指标包括术中及术后并发症、内皮细胞变化和人工晶状体相关结局。

结果

我们的搜索结果为 217 篇文献。剔除重复和不相关的报告后,我们纳入了 57 篇涉及 2624 只眼的文章。手术时的平均年龄为 51.47±25.62 岁。巩膜固定型人工晶状体在所有马凡综合征患者和 92.87%的小儿患者中最常被报道。术中并发症总发生率为 6.65%。轻微前房出血是最常见的术中(1.92%)和术后并发症(13.93%)。光学捕获是最常见的人工晶状体(IOL)相关并发症(4.47%)。总的来说,术后 16.77±11.04 个月时,内皮细胞丢失的平均值为 8.95%。总体上有 11.99%的 SFIOL 出现偏心,平均距离为 0.49±0.40mm,平均倾斜度为 4.11±3.03°。

结论

粘固型 SFIOL 的 IOL 相关并发症最少,内皮细胞丢失率最低。缝合型 SFIOL 与最高的 IOL 相关并发症相关,而无缝合型、无粘固型 SFIOL 则与最大的内皮细胞丢失相关。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review on Three Major Types of Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation.三种巩膜固定型人工晶状体植入术的系统评价
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 Jan 19;10(4):388-396. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000369.
2
Visual outcome and early complications of sutureless and glueless scleral fixated intraocular lens.无缝合无胶水巩膜固定人工晶状体的视觉效果和早期并发症
Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;8(15):41-46. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v8i1.16155.
3
A Comparative Study on Surgical Outcomes of Glued Intraocular Lens and Sutured Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation.黏附式人工晶状体与巩膜缝线固定人工晶状体植入手术效果的比较研究
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(4):576-580. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1346132. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries.复杂白内障手术中一期巩膜固定与一期前房人工晶状体植入术的效果比较。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Outcomes of sutureless and sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens in paediatric population.缝合与非缝合巩膜固定型人工晶状体在儿科人群中的应用效果比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;31(6):3379-3385. doi: 10.1177/1120672120965493. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
6
Comparison of flanged intrascleral intraocular lens fixation versus iris claw intraocular lens fixation: A retrospective study.巩膜瓣下眼内晶状体固定与虹膜夹式眼内晶状体固定的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;67(11):1838-1842. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_300_19.
7
Novel technique of sutureless glueless scleral fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL).无缝线无胶黏剂巩膜固定型人工晶状体(SFIOL)的新方法。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;67(1):64-68. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_447_18.
8
Retropupillary Iris-fixated versus Sutured Scleral-fixated Intraocular Lenses.瞳孔后虹膜固定型与巩膜缝合固定型人工晶状体
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan-Mar;68(1):13-18. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2024.04.
9
Multipiece posterior chamber intraocular lens as sutureless, glueless scleral fixated intraocular lens.多片式后房型人工晶状体作为无缝合、无黏附的巩膜固定人工晶状体。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 2;15(1):69-72. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_115_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Apr.
10
Comparative analysis of retropupillary iris claw versus scleral-fixated intraocular lens in the management of post-cataract aphakia.后发性白内障无晶状体眼患者应用巩膜固定型人工晶状体与虹膜夹型人工晶状体的对比分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;67(1):59-63. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_326_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Resuturing a Dislocated Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens in Brown-McLean Syndrome.复位布朗-麦克莱恩综合征中脱位的巩膜固定人工晶状体
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):5769. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165769.
2
Scleral-fixated IOLs - A comprehensive review of current practices and emerging trends.巩膜固定人工晶状体——当前实践与新趋势的全面综述
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):933-945. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2812_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
Capsule-augmented scleral fixation of intraocular lenses.人工晶状体的囊袋增强巩膜固定术
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):1065-1071. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2381_24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
4
Comparative Functional and Morphological Data of Different IOL Dislocation Treatment Methods.不同人工晶状体脱位治疗方法的功能和形态学比较数据
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):1462. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051462.
5
Factors Affecting Visual Outcomes Following Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation at a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.印度东部一家三级医疗中心巩膜固定人工晶状体植入术后影响视觉效果的因素
Cureus. 2024 Dec 21;16(12):e76154. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76154. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Trans-iris vertical intrascleral haptic fixation of IOL: The bypass technique in eyes with megalocornea.人工晶状体经虹膜垂直巩膜内触觉固定术:大角膜眼中的旁路技术
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 1;73(3):446-449. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_974_24. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
7
Commentary- Intraoperative aberrometry-assisted refractive optimization of SFIOL.评论——术中像差仪辅助的散光型人工晶状体屈光优化
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;73(1):151. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2473_24. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
8
Comparative long-term outcomes of vitrectomy combined with anterior chamber intraocular lens to intra-scleral haptic fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens.玻璃体切除术联合前房人工晶状体与后房人工晶状体巩膜内固定术的长期疗效比较。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Aug 26;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00572-2.
9
Assessment of refractive outcomes in eyes that underwent intraocular lens implantation in the posterior chamber but not "in-the-capsular bag:" A comparative retrospective study.对在后房进行人工晶状体植入但未植入“囊袋内”的眼睛的屈光结果评估:一项比较性回顾性研究。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 8;38(1):71-77. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_186_22. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
10
Comparative analysis of outcomes of two (popular) techniques of haptic exteriorization in scleral fixation intra-ocular lens surgery - A retrospective study.巩膜固定型人工晶状体手术中两种(常用)触觉外化技术效果的对比分析 - 一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 1;72(4):544-548. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_535_23. Epub 2024 Jan 8.