Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0244993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244993. eCollection 2021.
When standing, intrinsic ankle stiffness is smaller when measured using large perturbations, when sway size is large, and when background torque is low. However, there is a large variation in individual intrinsic ankle stiffness. Here we determine if individual variation has consequences for postural control. We examined the relationship between ankle stiffness, ankle torque and body sway across different individuals. Ankle stiffness was estimated in 19 standing participants by measuring torque responses to small, brief perturbations. Perturbation sizes of 0.2 & 0.9 degrees (both lasting 140 ms) measured short- and long-range stiffness respectively, while participants either stood quietly on a fixed platform or were imperceptibly tilted to reduce stability (0.1 Hz sinusoid; 0.2 & 0.4 deg). The spontaneous body sway component (natural random relatively rapid postural adjustments) and background ankle torque were averaged from sections immediately before perturbations. The results show that, first, intrinsic ankle stiffness is positively associated with ankle torque, and that this relationship is stronger for long-range stiffness. Second, intrinsic ankle stiffness is negatively associated with body sway, but, in contrast to the relationship with torque, this relationship is stronger for short-range stiffness. We conclude that high short-range intrinsic ankle stiffness is associated with reduced spontaneous sway, although the causal relationship between these two parameters is unknown. These results suggest that, in normal quiet standing where sway is very small, the most important determinant of intrinsic ankle stiffness may be stillness. In less stable conditions, intrinsic ankle stiffness may be more dependent on ankle torque.
当站立时,使用较大的扰动测量时,固有踝刚度较小,当摆动幅度较大,且背景扭矩较低时,固有踝刚度较小。然而,个体固有踝刚度的变化很大。在这里,我们确定个体变化是否会对姿势控制产生影响。我们研究了不同个体之间踝刚度,踝力矩和身体摆动之间的关系。通过测量对小而短暂的扰动的扭矩响应,在 19 名站立的参与者中估算了踝刚度。扰动大小为 0.2 和 0.9 度(均持续 140 毫秒),分别测量短程和长程刚度,而参与者要么安静地站在固定平台上,要么被不可察觉地倾斜以降低稳定性(0.1 Hz 正弦波;0.2 和 0.4 度)。自发的身体摆动分量(自然随机的相对快速姿势调整)和背景踝力矩从扰动之前的部分中平均得出。结果表明,首先,固有踝刚度与踝力矩正相关,并且长程刚度的相关性更强。其次,固有踝刚度与身体摆动负相关,但与与力矩的关系相反,短程刚度的相关性更强。我们得出的结论是,高短程固有踝刚度与减少自发性摆动有关,尽管这两个参数之间的因果关系尚不清楚。这些结果表明,在非常小的正常安静站立中,固有踝刚度的最重要决定因素可能是静止。在较不稳定的条件下,固有踝刚度可能更多地取决于踝力矩。