Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Gunma Sports Medicine Research Center, Zenshukai Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
J Knee Surg. 2022 Sep;35(11):1199-1203. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722347. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
A wide variety of fixation methods have been reported to fix anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial avulsion fractures, but there have been no studies into the fixation of these fractures with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape as an alternative to conventional thread. Type III ACL tibial avulsion fractures were created in 20 skeletally immature porcine knees. All specimens were randomized into two treatment groups: (1) pullout repair using no. 2 suture fixation and (2) pullout repair using UHMWPE suture tape fixation. The specimens were tested cyclically (20 cycles, 0-40 N, 100 mm/min) in the direction of the native ACL and loaded to failure (100 mm/min) on a tensile tester. Statistically significant differences between the structural properties (displacement, upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) under cyclic loading and single-cycle loading were analyzed. Displacement during cyclic testing was 1.56 ± 1.03 mm in the UltraBraid group and 0.99 ± 0.48 mm in the SUTURETAPE group, with no significant differences found between the groups ( = 0.13). There were no significant differences in upper yield load (161.9 ± 68.9 N in the UltraBraid group, 210.4 ± 60.1 N in the SUTURETAPE group, = 0.11), linear stiffness (14.7 ± 4.7N/mm in the UltraBraid group, 18.1 ± 7.9 N/mm in the SUTURETAPE group, = 0.27), or elongation at failure (20.1 ± 8.0 mm in the UltraBraid group, 21.5 ± 7.2 mm in the SUTURETAPE group, = 0.69). On the other hand, significant differences were observed in maximum load in the SUTURETAPE group (219.7 ± 89.2 N in the UltraBraid group, 319.3 ± 92.6 N in the SUTURETAPE group, = 0.025).
多种固定方法已被报道用于固定前交叉韧带(ACL)胫骨撕脱骨折,但尚未有研究将超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)缝线带替代传统缝线用于固定这些骨折。在 20 个未成熟的猪膝关节上创建了 III 型 ACL 胫骨撕脱骨折。所有标本均随机分为两组:(1)采用 2 号线缝线固定的拔出修复;(2)采用 UHMWPE 缝线带固定的拔出修复。标本在 ACL 方向上进行循环测试(20 个循环,0-40N,100mm/min),并在拉力试验机上进行单循环加载至失效(100mm/min)。对循环加载和单循环加载下结构性能(位移、上屈服载荷、最大载荷、线性刚度和破坏伸长率)进行了统计学差异分析。在循环测试中,UltraBraid 组的位移为 1.56±1.03mm,SUTURETAPE 组的位移为 0.99±0.48mm,两组间无显著差异( = 0.13)。上屈服载荷(UltraBraid 组为 161.9±68.9N,SUTURETAPE 组为 210.4±60.1N, = 0.11)、线性刚度(UltraBraid 组为 14.7±4.7N/mm,SUTURETAPE 组为 18.1±7.9N/mm, = 0.27)或破坏伸长率(UltraBraid 组为 20.1±8.0mm,SUTURETAPE 组为 21.5±7.2mm, = 0.69)无显著差异。另一方面,SUTURETAPE 组的最大载荷有显著差异(UltraBraid 组为 219.7±89.2N,SUTURETAPE 组为 319.3±92.6N, = 0.025)。