Suppr超能文献

三胫骨隧道网缝线固定后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的生物力学研究。

Biomechanical study of posterior cruciate ligament tibial arrest avulsion fracture fixation with triple tibial channel net sutures.

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Sichuan Provincial Laboratory of Orthopaedic Engineering, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50479-5.

Abstract

To investigate the biomechanical properties of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibia fixed using four different methods, including triple tibial channel net suture fixation. In 40 porcine knees, a standardized bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament was generated. Double tibial bone channel suture fixation was performed in group A, double-head hollow compression screw fixation was performed in group B, triple tibial bone channel net suture fixation was performed in group C, and cortical suspension EndoButton fixation was performed in group D. The constructs were cyclically loaded 500 times (10 to 100 N) to measure the initial displacement and stiffness values. Subsequently, loading to failure was performed, and the yield load and peak load were measured. The results were analysed by one-way ANOVA, with significance set at P < 0.05. The initial displacement in group D (1.00 ± 0.20 mm) was lower than that in group C (1.46 ± 0.33 mm, P = 0.000), group B (1.91 ± 1.71 mm, P = 0.000) and group A (3.91 ± 0.79 mm, P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = 0.055). The initial stiffness in group A (50.59 ± 6.89 N/mm) was lower than that in group C (67.21 ± 12.80 N/mm, P = 0.001), group D (71.18 ± 9.20 N/mm, P = 0.000) and group B (78.67 ± 5.91 N/mm, P = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference between groups B and D or between groups C and D (P = 0.111 and P = 0.391). The yield load in group A (554.86 ± 71.43 N) was lower than that in group C (767.00 ± 34.53 N, P = 0.000), group D (777.62 ± 73.03 N, P = 0.000) and group B (837.50 ± 55.73 N, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference between groups C and D (P = 0.729). The peak load in group A (667.38 ± 61.54 N) was lower than that in group C (842.00 ± 26.20 N, P = 0.000), group D (867.63 ± 63.42 N, P = 0.000) and group B (901.25 ± 54.38 N, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference between groups C and D (P = 0.346). Different failure modes were found among the four groups. The triple tibial bone channel suture fixation group showed better initial stability and fixation strength, which was comparable to that in the cortical suspension EndoButton fixation group and double-head hollow compression screw fixation group and significantly stronger than that in the double tibial bone channel suture fixation group. This study analysed the dynamic and static indexes of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures fixed by four different fixation methods under cyclic loading tests and single failure loading tests, providing a theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

摘要

为了研究四种不同方法(包括三胫骨通道网缝合固定)固定后交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折的生物力学特性。在 40 个猪膝关节中,产生了标准化的后交叉韧带骨性撕脱。在 A 组中进行双胫骨骨通道缝合固定,在 B 组中进行双头空心压缩螺钉固定,在 C 组中进行三胫骨骨通道网缝合固定,在 D 组中进行皮质悬吊 EndoButton 固定。对构建物进行 500 次循环加载(10 至 100N),以测量初始位移和刚度值。随后,进行失效加载,并测量屈服载荷和峰值载荷。通过单因素方差分析对结果进行分析,显著性水平设为 P<0.05。D 组的初始位移(1.00±0.20mm)低于 C 组(1.46±0.33mm,P=0.000)、B 组(1.91±1.71mm,P=0.000)和 A 组(3.91±0.79mm,P=0.000),但 B 组和 C 组之间没有显著差异(P=0.055)。A 组的初始刚度(50.59±6.89N/mm)低于 C 组(67.21±12.80N/mm,P=0.001)、D 组(71.18±9.20N/mm,P=0.000)和 B 组(78.67±5.91N/mm,P=0.000)。然而,B 组和 D 组或 C 组和 D 组之间没有显著差异(P=0.111 和 P=0.391)。A 组的屈服载荷(554.86±71.43N)低于 C 组(767.00±34.53N,P=0.000)、D 组(777.62±73.03N,P=0.000)和 B 组(837.50±55.73N,P=0.000)。C 组和 D 组之间没有显著差异(P=0.729)。A 组的峰值载荷(667.38±61.54N)低于 C 组(842.00±26.20N,P=0.000)、D 组(867.63±63.42N,P=0.000)和 B 组(901.25±54.38N,P=0.000)。C 组和 D 组之间没有显著差异(P=0.346)。四个组中发现了不同的失效模式。三胫骨通道缝合固定组显示出更好的初始稳定性和固定强度,与皮质悬吊 EndoButton 固定组和双头空心压缩螺钉固定组相当,且明显强于双胫骨通道缝合固定组。本研究通过循环加载试验和单失效加载试验分析了四种不同固定方法固定后交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折的动态和静态指标,为临床治疗提供了理论依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e10c/10752874/c9b2181d9aab/41598_2023_50479_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验