Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00512-x.
Individuals tend to avoid effortful tasks, regardless of whether they are physical or mental in nature. Recent experimental evidence is suggestive of individual differences in the dispositional willingness to invest cognitive effort in goal-directed behavior. The traits need for cognition (NFC) and self-control are related to behavioral measures of cognitive effort discounting and demand avoidance, respectively. Given that these traits are only moderately related, the question arises whether they reflect a common core factor underlying cognitive effort investment. If so, the common core of both traits might be related to behavioral measures of effort discounting in a more systematic fashion. To address this question, we aimed at specifying a core construct of cognitive effort investment that reflects dispositional differences in the willingness and tendency to exert effortful control.
We conducted two studies (N = 613 and N = 244) with questionnaires related to cognitive motivation and effort investment including assessment of NFC, intellect, self-control and effortful control. We first calculated Pearson correlations followed by two mediation models regarding intellect and its separate aspects, seek and conquer, as mediators. Next, we performed a confirmatory factor analysis of a hierarchical model of cognitive effort investment as second-order latent variable. First-order latent variables were cognitive motivation reflecting NFC and intellect, and effortful self-control reflecting self-control and effortful control. Finally, we calculated Pearson correlations between factor scores of the latent variables and general self-efficacy as well as traits of the Five Factor Model of Personality for validation purposes.
Our findings support the hypothesized correlations between the assessed traits, where the relationship of NFC and self-control is specifically mediated via goal-directedness. We established and replicated a hierarchical factor model of cognitive motivation and effortful self-control that explains the shared variance of the first-order factors by a second-order factor of cognitive effort investment.
Taken together, our results integrate disparate literatures on cognitive motivation and self-control and provide a basis for further experimental research on the role of dispositional individual differences in goal-directed behavior and cost-benefit-models.
无论任务是体力性质还是脑力性质,个体都倾向于回避费力的任务。最近的实验证据表明,个体在投入认知努力以实现目标导向行为的倾向方面存在差异。认知需求(NFC)和自我控制这两个特质分别与认知努力贴现和需求回避的行为测量相关。鉴于这两个特质只是中度相关,问题就出现了,它们是否反映了认知努力投入的共同核心因素。如果是这样,那么这两个特质的共同点可能会以更系统的方式与努力贴现的行为测量相关。为了解决这个问题,我们旨在确定一个反映认知努力投入的倾向和意愿的核心结构,该结构反映了特质上的差异。
我们进行了两项研究(N=613 和 N=244),使用了与认知动机和努力投入相关的问卷,包括对 NFC、智力、自我控制和努力控制的评估。我们首先计算了 Pearson 相关系数,然后进行了两个中介模型的研究,其中智力及其单独的方面,即探索和征服,被视为中介。接下来,我们对认知努力投入的层次模型进行了验证性因素分析,作为二阶潜在变量。一阶潜在变量是反映 NFC 和智力的认知动机,以及反映自我控制和努力控制的努力自我控制。最后,我们计算了潜在变量因子得分与一般自我效能感以及人格五因素模型特质之间的 Pearson 相关系数,以验证目的。
我们的研究结果支持了所评估特质之间的假设相关性,其中 NFC 和自我控制的关系通过目标导向具体中介。我们建立并复制了认知动机和努力自我控制的层次因素模型,该模型通过认知努力投入的二阶因素解释了一阶因素的共同方差。
综上所述,我们的研究结果整合了认知动机和自我控制的不同文献,并为进一步研究个体差异在目标导向行为和成本效益模型中的作用提供了基础。