Garrido-Abad Pablo, Senra-Bravo Isabel, Manfredi Celeste, Fernández-Pascual Esaú, Linares-Espinós Estefanía, Fernández-Arjona Manuel, Varillas-Delgado David, Martínez-Salamanca Juan Ignacio
Urology Department, Hospital Universitario del Henares, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Int J Impot Res. 2022 Mar;34(2):164-171. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00400-9. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the first-line therapeutic option for erectile dysfunction (ED), while second-line therapy includes the alprostadil. Due to the different pharmacodynamic mechanism of PDE5Is and alprostadil, a synergistic action is conceivable when they are administered in combination. The aim of present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with PDE5I and topical alprostadil in patients with ED non-responders to PDE5I alone. We designed a prospective, two-arm, open-label, non-randomized study. Patients over 18 years old, with a stable sexual relationship for at least 6 months, and ED non-responders to PDE5I monotherapy were included in the study. At baseline the variables assessed were 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and Sexual Encounter Profile Questions 2 and 3 (SEP-2 and SEP-3). In addition, all subjects underwent penile dynamic duplex ultrasonography. All patients were assigned to the monotherapy group (Group A) or combination therapy group (Group B) based on their preference. Topical alprostadil 300 μg/100 mg (Virirec®) was the treatment assigned to Group A, while the combination therapy with the last PDE5I taken (at the maximum recommended dose) plus topical alprostadil 300 μg/100 mg (Virirec®) was assigned to Group B. After 3 months from assignment to groups were evaluated IIEF-5, SEP-2 and SEP-3 regarding the last sexual intercourse, and Global Assessment Questionnaire-Questions 1 and 2 (GAQ-1 and GAQ-2). All adverse events (AEs) that occurred during the study period were recorded. A total of 170 patients were included in the study (72 in Group A and 98 in Group B). Fifty-two patients were previously treated with sildenafil 100 mg (30.6%), 6 with vardenafil 20 mg (3.5%), 56 with tadalafil 20 mg (32.9%), and 56 with avanafil 200 mg (32.9%). No significant differences among the study groups were found at baseline (p > 0.05). The mean IIEF-5 score increased significantly in Group B after treatment compared to baseline (12.4 ± 3.4 vs. 17.1 ± 4.5; p < 0.001), conversely patients in Group A showed no significant increase (12.2 ± 2.5 vs. 12.7 ± 3.1; p = 0.148). The number of affirmative responses to SEP-2 was significantly higher after treatment compared to baseline only in Group B (57 vs. 78; p < 0.001). The number of affirmative responses to SEP-3 was significantly higher after treatment compared to baseline in both groups (p < 0.001). The number of affirmative responses to GAQ-Q1 and GAQ-Q2 was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (p < 0.001). A total of 59 (34.7%) patients experienced AEs. They were mild, self-limited, and did not cause discontinuation of treatment. No episode of priapism was recorded. No statistically significant difference was recorded between the AEs of the two groups, except for facial flushing that was reported only in Group B (p = 0.021). The combination therapy with topical alprostadil and PDE5I seems to be more effective than topical alprostadil alone without worsening the safety of the treatment.
5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(PDE5Is)是勃起功能障碍(ED)的一线治疗选择,而二线治疗包括前列地尔。由于PDE5Is和前列地尔的药效学机制不同,联合使用时可能会产生协同作用。本研究的目的是评估PDE5I与外用前列地尔联合治疗对单独使用PDE5I无反应的ED患者的疗效和安全性。我们设计了一项前瞻性、双臂、开放标签、非随机研究。年龄超过18岁、有至少6个月稳定性关系且对PDE5I单药治疗无反应的ED患者被纳入研究。在基线时评估的变量包括国际勃起功能指数5项版(IIEF-5)以及性接触概况问题2和3(SEP-2和SEP-)。此外,所有受试者均接受阴茎动态双功超声检查。所有患者根据自身偏好被分配到单药治疗组(A组)或联合治疗组(B组)。外用前列地尔300μg/100mg(Virirec®)被分配给A组,而将最后服用的PDE5I(最大推荐剂量)与外用前列地尔300μg/100mg(Virirec®)联合治疗分配给B组。分组3个月后,评估关于最后一次性交的IIEF-5、SEP-2和SEP-3,以及总体评估问卷问题1和2(GAQ-1和GAQ-2)。记录研究期间发生的所有不良事件(AE)。共有170例患者纳入研究(A组72例,B组98例)。52例患者曾接受过100mg西地那非治疗(30.6%),6例接受过20mg伐地那非治疗(3.5%),56例接受过%)。研究组之间在基线时未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。与基线相比,治疗后B组的平均IIEF-5评分显著增加(12.4±3.4对17.1±4.5;p<0.001),相反,A组患者无显著增加(12.2±2.对12.7±3.1;p=0.148)。仅在B组中,治疗后对SEP-2的肯定回答数量与基线相比显著更高(57对78;p<0.001)。两组治疗后对SEP-3的肯定回答数量与基线相比均显著更高(p<0.001)。B组对GAQ-Q1和GAQ-Q2的肯定回答数量显著高于A组(p<0.001)。共有59例(34.7%)患者发生AE。这些AE为轻度、自限性,未导致治疗中断。未记录到阴茎异常勃起事件。除仅在B组报告有面部潮红外(p=0.021),两组AE之间未记录到统计学显著差异。外用前列地尔与PDE5I联合治疗似乎比单独使用外用前列地尔更有效,且未使治疗安全性恶化。