Suppr超能文献

延迟对比增强计算机断层扫描纹理分析诊断心脏结节病。

Texture analysis of delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2021 May;39(5):442-450. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01086-1. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic value of texture analysis to differentiate cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (non-CS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty CS patients and 15 non-CS patients who had undergone myocardial CT delayed enhancement (CTDE) were included. A total of 36 texture features were calculated according to the CT attenuation of CTDE. We investigated the diagnostic value to differentiate CS from non-CS. We also assessed the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for each feature and inter-observer agreement for visual assessment.

RESULTS

Seven extracted features had significantly higher run length non-uniformity (RLNU) values (5.4 × 10 ± 6.2 × 10 vs. 11.2 × 10 ± 4.9 × 10, p = 0.037) and significantly lower low gray-level zone emphasis (LGZE) values (7.1 × 10 ± 8.6 × 10 vs. 18.1 × 10 ± 16.9 × 10, p = 0.017) in CS than in non-CS. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of RLNU and LGZE were excellent (ICCs > 0.8), while inter-observer agreement of visual assessment was poor (kappa = 0.19). The accuracies of texture analysis were 69% with RLNU and 71% with LGZE, which were better than that of visual assessment.

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis of CTDE could differentiate CS from non-CS with high reproducibility.

摘要

目的

探究纹理分析在鉴别心脏结节病(CS)与其他非缺血性心肌病(非-CS)中的诊断价值。

材料与方法

共纳入 20 例 CS 患者和 15 例非-CS 患者,均行心肌 CT 延迟强化(CTDE)检查。根据 CTDE 的 CT 衰减值计算了 36 个纹理特征。我们探讨了鉴别 CS 和非-CS 的诊断价值。我们还评估了每个特征的内部和观察者间的可重复性以及视觉评估的观察者间一致性。

结果

7 个提取的特征具有更高的游程长度非均匀性(RLNU)值(5.4×10±6.2×10 与 11.2×10±4.9×10,p=0.037)和更低的低灰度区强调(LGZE)值(7.1×10±8.6×10 与 18.1×10±16.9×10,p=0.017),CS 患者的 RLNU 和 LGZE 值明显低于非-CS 患者。RLNU 和 LGZE 的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性均为优秀(ICC>0.8),而视觉评估的观察者间一致性较差(kappa=0.19)。纹理分析的准确率分别为 RLNU 时的 69%和 LGZE 时的 71%,均优于视觉评估。

结论

CTDE 的纹理分析具有良好的可重复性,可用于鉴别 CS 和非-CS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验