• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝素与 0.9%生理盐水在维持癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港通畅中的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Heparin versus 0.9% saline solution to maintain patency of totally implanted venous access ports in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing, Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Apr;27(2):e12913. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12913. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1111/ijn.12913
PMID:33484061
Abstract

AIM

The use of heparin and 0.9% saline solution is always controversial for central venous catheters. However, there is no systematic review or guideline about whether saline solution can replace heparin solution in adult cancer patients with totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). The purpose of this review is to evaluate whether saline solution can replace heparin saline to lock TIVAPs.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Ovid (January 1, 1982, and February 21, 2020). All statistical analyses of the meta-analysis were completed using the Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 201 studies were identified from these databases after initial review, and four studies met inclusion criteria, including 2652 cases. There was little heterogeneity among the included studies (I < 30%), and all analyses were conducted by the fixed-effects model. The total complications, catheter occlusions, catheter-related bloodstream infections and other complication rates in the heparin solution group were higher than in the saline solution group. In the subgroup analysis of heparin concentration, total complication rates in the saline solution group were higher than with 50 U of heparin and lower than with 100 U of heparin. However, the differences in these complications were small, and no significant difference was observed (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on existing clinical studies, we recommend that saline solution can replace 50 or 100 U/ml of heparin as a safe and effective flush solution for TIVAPs.

摘要

目的

肝素和 0.9%生理盐水溶液在中心静脉导管中的应用一直存在争议。然而,目前尚无关于生理盐水溶液是否可以替代肝素溶液用于成人癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAP)的系统评价或指南。本综述的目的是评估生理盐水溶液是否可以替代肝素盐水来封管 TIVAP。

方法

检索了以下数据库:PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL 和 Ovid(1982 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 21 日)。使用 Review Manager 5.3 完成荟萃分析的所有统计分析。

结果

经过初步审查,从这些数据库中总共确定了 201 项研究,其中 4 项研究符合纳入标准,共包括 2652 例患者。纳入研究的异质性很小(I < 30%),所有分析均采用固定效应模型进行。肝素溶液组的总并发症、导管堵塞、导管相关性血流感染和其他并发症发生率高于生理盐水溶液组。在肝素浓度的亚组分析中,生理盐水溶液组的总并发症发生率高于 50 U 肝素组,低于 100 U 肝素组。然而,这些并发症的差异较小,无显著性差异(均 P > 0.05)。

结论

基于现有临床研究,我们建议生理盐水溶液可以替代 50 或 100 U/ml 的肝素作为 TIVAP 的安全有效的冲洗溶液。

相似文献

1
Heparin versus 0.9% saline solution to maintain patency of totally implanted venous access ports in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝素与 0.9%生理盐水在维持癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港通畅中的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Apr;27(2):e12913. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12913. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Low-dose versus high-dose heparin locks for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低剂量与高剂量肝素封管用于血液透析导管:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Nephrol. 2016 Jul;86(7):1-8. doi: 10.5414/CN108701.
3
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with totally implantable venous access ports in cancer patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港相关血流感染的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan;28(1):361-372. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04809-x. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Randomized clinical trial analyzing maintenance of peripheral venous catheters in an internal medicine unit: Heparin vs. saline.随机临床试验分析内科病房外周静脉留置导管的维持:肝素与生理盐水。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):e0226251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226251. eCollection 2020.
5
Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.柠檬酸盐与肝素封管用于血液透析导管:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人患者中心静脉导管通畅性:生理盐水与肝素比较的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2017 Jan 8;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1585-x.
7
Efficacy of normal saline versus heparinized saline solution for locking catheters of totally implantable long-term central vascular access devices in adult cancer patients.生理盐水与肝素化生理盐水在成年癌症患者全植入式长期中央血管通路装置锁管中的疗效比较。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;35(4):E35-42. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31823312b1.
8
Prolonging the flush-lock interval of totally implantable venous access ports in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.延长癌症患者全植入式静脉输液港的冲洗锁定间隔:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Sep;22(5):814-821. doi: 10.1177/1129729820950998. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous catheters: a systematic review.肝素冲洗和其他维持中心静脉导管通畅的干预措施:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2007-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05103.x.
10
Flushing the central venous catheter: is heparin necessary?冲洗中心静脉导管:是否需要使用肝素?
J Vasc Access. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):241-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000225. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
[Clinical Practice and Quality Control Guidelines for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients (2024)].《癌症患者完全植入式静脉输液港临床实践与质量控制指南(2024年)》
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 20;56(2):400-410. doi: 10.12182/20250360602.
2
Administration of 4% tetrasodium EDTA lock solution and central venous catheter complications in high-risk pediatric patients with intestinal failure: A retrospective cohort study.4% 四钠依地酸封管液在高危儿科肠衰竭患者中的应用与中心静脉导管并发症:一项回顾性队列研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2024 Jul;48(5):624-632. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2644. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.
肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.
4
Heparin versus normal saline for the care of peripheral intravenous catheters in pediatrics: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.肝素与生理盐水在儿科外周静脉导管护理中的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04515-y.
5
Great progress for totally implantable venous access devices: still not completed.全植入式静脉通路装置取得了巨大进展:但仍未完善。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 16;408(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02833-4.
6
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与 0.9%氯化钠封管预防成人中心静脉导管阻塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 18;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4.