Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jun;46(6):2699-2711. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02906-8. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
The purpose of this review is to describe the potential sources of variability or discrepancy in interpretation of cystic renal masses under the Bosniak v2019 classification system. Strategies to avoid these pitfalls and clinical examples of diagnostic approaches are also presented. Potential pitfalls in the application of Bosniak v2019 are divided into three categories: interpretative, technical, and mass related. An organized, comprehensive review of possible discrepancies in interpreting Bosniak v2019 cystic masses is presented with pictorial examples of difficult clinical cases and proposed solutions. The scheme provided can guide readers to consistent, precise application of the classification system. Radiologists should be aware of the possible sources of misinterpretation of cystic renal masses when applying Bosniak v2019. Knowing which features and types of cystic masses are prone to interpretive errors, in addition to the inherent trade-offs between the CT and MR techniques used to characterize them, can help radiologists avoid these pitfalls.
本文旨在描述在 Bosniak v2019 分类系统下,解读囊性肾肿块时潜在的变异或差异来源。还介绍了避免这些陷阱的策略和诊断方法的临床实例。Bosniak v2019 应用中的潜在陷阱分为三类:解释性、技术性和肿块相关。本文对解读 Bosniak v2019 囊性肿块时可能存在的差异进行了有组织、全面的回顾,并通过困难临床病例的图片示例和提出的解决方案进行了说明。所提供的方案可以指导读者对分类系统进行一致、准确的应用。放射科医生在应用 Bosniak v2019 时应该意识到囊性肾肿块可能存在的误读来源。了解哪些特征和类型的囊性肿块容易出现解释性错误,以及用于对其进行特征描述的 CT 和 MR 技术之间固有的权衡取舍,有助于放射科医生避免这些陷阱。