Bosniak classification of renal cysts using large language models: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND

The Bosniak classification system is widely used to assess malignancy risk in renal cystic lesions, yet inter-observer variability poses significant challenges. Large language models (LLMs) may offer a standardized approach to classification when provided with textual descriptions, such as those found in radiology reports.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the performance of five LLMs-GPT‑4 (ChatGPT), Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, and NotebookLM-in classifying renal cysts based on synthetic textual descriptions mimicking CT report content.

METHODS

A synthetic dataset of 100 diagnostic scenarios (20 cases per Bosniak category) was constructed using established radiological criteria. Each LLM was evaluated using zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies, while NotebookLM employed retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Statistical significance was assessed using McNemar's and chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

GPT‑4 achieved the highest accuracy (87% zero-shot, 99% few-shot), followed by Copilot (81-86%), Gemini (55-69%), and Perplexity (43-69%). NotebookLM, tested only under RAG conditions, reached 87% accuracy. Few-shot learning significantly improved performance (p < 0.05). Classification of Bosniak IIF lesions remained challenging across models.

CONCLUSION

When provided with well-structured textual descriptions, LLMs can accurately classify renal cysts. Few-shot prompting significantly enhances performance. However, persistent difficulties in classifying borderline lesions such as Bosniak IIF highlight the need for further refinement and real-world validation.