Suppr超能文献

局部环孢素 A(0.05%)治疗干眼症患者:干燥综合征与非干燥综合征的对比研究。

Topical cyclosporine a (0.05%) treatment in dry eye patients: a comparison study of Sjogren's syndrome versus non-Sjogren's syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Ophthalmology, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Izzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital, Bolu, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;41(4):1479-1485. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01708-1. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical effect of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) (0.05%) on dry eye patients with Sjogren's syndrome (SS) and non-Sjogren's syndrome (NSS).

METHOD

This retrospective comparative study includes the dry eye (DE) patients who were treated with topical CsA. DE patients were divided into two groups as follows: DE with Sjogren's syndrome (DE-SS) and DE with Non-Sjogren's syndrome (DE-NSS). Dry eye parameters were recorded at baseline and each visit.

RESULTS

Schirmer's test 1 scores were 2.7 ± 0.5 mm at baseline and 3.5 ± 0.7 mm at 12th month in DE-SS, 2.9 ± 0.7 mm at baseline and 9.5 ± 0.7 mm in DE-NSS groups at 12th month. Mean ST score was higher in DE-NSS group than DE-SS group at sixth and 12th months of the treatment (both p = 0.001). Tear break-up time score showed a significant improvement in DE-NSS group, and it was lower in DE-NSS group than DE-SS group group at sixth and 12th months of the treatment (p = 0.044 and 0.027, respectively). Mean OSDI score was lower in DE-NSS group than DE-SS group at sixth and 12th months of the treatment (p = 0.030 and 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Topical CsA seems to be more effective in the treatment of the DE-NSS.

摘要

目的

评估局部环孢素 A(CsA)(0.05%)治疗干燥综合征(SS)和非干燥综合征(NSS)患者干眼症的临床疗效。

方法

本回顾性对照研究包括接受局部 CsA 治疗的干眼症(DE)患者。DE 患者分为以下两组:干燥综合征相关干眼症(DE-SS)和非干燥综合征相关干眼症(DE-NSS)。在基线和每次就诊时记录干眼参数。

结果

SS 组 Schirmer 试验 1 评分从基线的 2.7±0.5mm 增加到 12 个月时的 3.5±0.7mm,NSS 组从基线的 2.9±0.7mm 增加到 12 个月时的 9.5±0.7mm。在治疗的第 6 和 12 个月,NSS 组的平均 ST 评分均高于 SS 组(均 p=0.001)。泪膜破裂时间评分在 NSS 组中显著改善,且在治疗的第 6 和 12 个月时均低于 SS 组(分别为 p=0.044 和 0.027)。NSS 组的平均 OSDI 评分低于 SS 组,在治疗的第 6 和 12 个月时差异有统计学意义(分别为 p=0.030 和 0.032)。

结论

局部 CsA 似乎对 NSS 相关的 DE 治疗更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验