Jee Donghyun, Han Su Yeon, Kim Hyun Seung, Kim Eun Chul
Department of Ophthalmology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04173-x.
To compare the effects of cyclosporine 0.05% and 0.1% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.
120 eyes of 60 patients who have been diagnosed with Sjögren's syndrome were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty patients (group 1, 60 eyes) were treated with cyclosporine 0.1% and 30 patients (group 2, 60 eyes) with cyclosporine 0.05%. Ocular Surface Disease Index Questionnaire (OSDI), Schirmer I test, noninvasive tear break up time (NItBUT), corneal staining score, MMP 9, meibography, meibum quality and expressibility scores, tear meniscus height, and impression cytology were examined before treatment and at 1 and 3 months after treatment.
All of dry eye signs and symptoms of both groups at 1 and 3 months were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, respectively (P < 0.05). OSDI, Schirmer I test, NItBUT, corneal and conunctival fluorescein score, MMP-9 grade, goblet cell density, and impression cytology grade of group1 were significantly improved compared with group 2 at 1 and 3 months after treatment (P < 0.05). The percentage of discontinued treatment in groups 1 and 2 was 26.7 and 3.3%, respectively.
Cyclosporine 0.1% was more effective for relieving inflammatory dry eye signs and symptoms but less tolerable compared with cyclosporine 0.05% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.
比较0.05%和0.1%环孢素对干燥综合征干眼症的疗效。
回顾性纳入60例已诊断为干燥综合征患者的120只眼。30例患者(第1组,60只眼)接受0.1%环孢素治疗,30例患者(第2组,60只眼)接受0.05%环孢素治疗。在治疗前以及治疗后1个月和3个月时,检查眼表疾病指数问卷(OSDI)、Schirmer I试验、无创泪膜破裂时间(NItBUT)、角膜染色评分、基质金属蛋白酶9(MMP 9)、睑板腺造影、睑脂质量和可挤压性评分、泪河高度以及印迹细胞学检查。
两组在治疗后1个月和3个月时的所有干眼体征和症状与治疗前相比均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。治疗后1个月和3个月时,第1组的OSDI、Schirmer I试验、NItBUT、角膜和结膜荧光素评分、MMP - 9分级、杯状细胞密度和印迹细胞学分级与第2组相比均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。第1组和第2组的停药率分别为26.7%和3.3%。
在干燥综合征干眼症中,0.1%环孢素在缓解炎症性干眼体征和症状方面更有效,但与0.05%环孢素相比耐受性较差。