Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2145.
Routine childhood immunizations against infectious diseases are an integral part of our public health infrastructure. They provide direct protection to the immunized individual and indirect protection to children and adults unable to be immunized via the effect of community immunity. All 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have regulations requiring proof of immunization for child care and school attendance as a public health strategy to protect children in these settings and to secondarily serve as a mechanism to promote timely immunization of children by their caregivers. Although all states and the District of Columbia have mechanisms to exempt school attendees from specific immunization requirements for medical reasons, the majority also have a heterogeneous collection of regulations and laws that allow nonmedical exemptions from childhood immunizations otherwise required for child care and school attendance. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) supports regulations and laws requiring certification of immunization to attend child care and school as a sound means of providing a safe environment for attendees and employees of these settings. The AAP also supports medically indicated exemptions to specific immunizations as determined for each individual child. The AAP views nonmedical exemptions to school-required immunizations as inappropriate for individual, public health, and ethical reasons and advocates for their elimination.
常规的儿童传染病免疫接种是我们公共卫生基础设施的一个组成部分。它们为免疫个体提供直接保护,并通过社区免疫的效果为无法免疫的儿童和成人提供间接保护。所有 50 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各都有规定,要求儿童保育和上学时提供免疫证明,作为保护这些场所儿童的公共卫生策略,并作为促进其照顾者及时为儿童进行免疫接种的机制。尽管所有州和哥伦比亚特区都有机制允许因医疗原因免除学校学生的特定免疫接种要求,但大多数州也有一系列不同的法规和法律,允许对儿童保育和上学所需的儿童免疫接种进行非医疗豁免。美国儿科学会(AAP)支持要求免疫接种证明才能参加儿童保育和上学的法规和法律,认为这是为这些场所的参加者和员工提供安全环境的合理手段。AAP 还支持根据每个儿童的具体情况,对特定免疫接种进行医学指示豁免。AAP 认为,出于个人、公共卫生和伦理原因,不应该对学校要求的免疫接种进行非医疗豁免,并主张取消这些豁免。