University of Silesia, Poland.
West Virginia University, USA.
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105828. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
This quasi-experimental design study in Poland explored the extent to which attitudes toward cluttering of university students could be changed or improved after a series of activities dedicated to attaining deeper recognition of problems associated with fluency disorders.
University students were assigned to either an Experimental or a Control group, with 39 in each (total = 78). They all completed the Polish version of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Cluttering (POSHA-Cl) on two occasions up to eight weeks apart. Participants in the Experimental group attended the following intervention activities: watching and discussing an educational video on cluttering, participating in a workshop on the nature of cluttering, and watching and discussing a documentary on the life experiences of people struggling with fluency disorders. The Experimental group also filled out an open-ended questionnaire at the end of the study.
Pre-intervention comparisons indicated that participants assigned to either of the Experimental or Control groups differed significantly on 2 of the 15 summary ratings (13 %) of their pre-POSHA-Cl attitudes toward cluttering. For the Experimental group, the intervention resulted in significant positive changes in cluttering attitudes on 8 of the 15 summary ratings (53 %). In contrast, pre- and post- POSHA-Cl scores for the Control group were essentially unchanged (0 of 15 ratings).
This quasi-experimental study demonstrated that it is possible to positively modify the cluttering attitudes of university students. This has implications for the length, content, and experiential components of interventions designed to improve public attitudes toward fluency disorders.
本波兰准实验设计研究旨在探讨在一系列旨在加深对流畅障碍相关问题的认识的活动之后,大学生对口吃的态度能否发生改变或得到改善。
将大学生分为实验组和对照组,每组 39 人(共 78 人)。他们在 8 周内两次完成了波兰版公众对口吃属性的态度调查(POSHA-Cl)。实验组参加了以下干预活动:观看和讨论口吃教育视频、参加口吃本质研讨会、观看和讨论有关流利障碍患者生活经历的纪录片。实验组在研究结束时还填写了一份开放式问卷。
干预前的比较表明,实验组和对照组的参与者在 15 项口吃态度总结评价中的 2 项(13%)上存在显著差异。对于实验组,口吃态度在 15 项总结评价中的 8 项上发生了显著的积极变化(53%)。相比之下,对照组的 POSHA-Cl 得分在干预前后基本保持不变(15 项评价中没有一项)。
这项准实验研究表明,改变大学生对口吃的态度是可能的。这对旨在改善公众对口吃障碍态度的干预措施的时长、内容和体验成分具有启示意义。