School of Psychological Sciences and Health, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK.
École de psychologie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, Université Laval, 2325 rue des bibliothèques, Félix-Antoine-Savard Local 1044, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Sleep Med Clin. 2021 Mar;16(1):155-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
This article discusses information extracted from 53 studies that have measured adherence to cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia. There has been an increase in more complex and less biased methods for assessing adherence that move beyond simply asking the patients whether they have adhered to the intervention or not. There is a need for a consensus around how to measure adherence, if clinicians want to arrive at an estimate of optimal adherence. Heterogeneity of studies, particularly in the way adherence is operationalized, prohibited conclusions about the relationship between adherence and outcome, as well as about predictors of adherence.
本文讨论了从 53 项研究中提取的信息,这些研究测量了对失眠认知行为疗法的依从性。评估依从性的方法越来越复杂,偏见也越来越少,不仅简单地询问患者是否坚持了干预措施。如果临床医生想要估计最佳依从性,就需要就如何衡量依从性达成共识。研究的异质性,特别是在依从性的操作化方式方面,使得无法得出关于依从性与结果之间的关系,以及关于依从性预测因素的结论。