Pham Diana M, Gonzalez Maria D, Ontiveros Joe C, Kasper F Kurtis, Frey Gary N, Belles Donald M
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
J Prosthodont. 2021 Dec;30(9):804-810. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13339. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
To evaluate the wear resistance of a recently developed three-dimensional (3D) printed denture teeth resin compared to three commercially available prefabricated denture teeth.
A total of 88 maxillary first molar denture teeth were evaluated: C (Classic; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA), DCL (SR Postaris DCL; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), IPN (Portrait IPN; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA), and F (Denture Teeth A2 Resin 1 L; Formlabs, Somerville, MA). The 3D printed denture tooth specimens were fabricated from a methacrylate-based photopolymerizing resin using stereolithography (SLA). Denture teeth were subjected to a three-body wear test with a poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) abrasive slurry. A Leinfelder-style four station wear apparatus with custom bullet-shaped milled zirconia styli was utilized with a load force of 36-40 N at 1.7 Hz for 200,000 cycles. Maximum depth of wear was measured using a lab grade scanner and analyzing software program. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's Multiple Comparisons post hoc test (α = 0.05).
A statistically significant difference in depth of wear was found between denture tooth materials (p < 0.001). The mean vertical depth of wear for the 3D printed denture teeth (0.016 ± 0.010 mm) was statistically significantly less than the prefabricated denture teeth. The highly cross-linked denture teeth, DCL (0.036 ± 0.011 mm) and IPN (0.035 ± 0.014 mm), exhibited statistically significantly less wear than the conventional acrylic denture teeth. The conventional acrylic denture teeth demonstrated the greatest wear (0.058 ± 0.014 mm). No significant difference in depth of wear was found between DCL and IPN (p > 0.001).
Denture tooth material significantly influences the depth of wear. The 3D printed denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to the commercially available prefabricated denture teeth when opposed to zirconia. Denture teeth fabricated with SLA technology may have a promising future in prosthetic dentistry.
评估一种新开发的三维(3D)打印义齿牙树脂与三种市售预制义齿牙相比的耐磨性。
共评估88颗上颌第一磨牙义齿牙:C(经典款;登士柏西诺德,宾夕法尼亚州约克)、DCL(SR Postaris DCL;义获嘉伟瓦登特,列支敦士登沙恩)、IPN(Portrait IPN;登士柏西诺德,宾夕法尼亚州约克)和F(义齿牙A2树脂1L;Formlabs,马萨诸塞州萨默维尔)。3D打印义齿牙标本由基于甲基丙烯酸酯的光聚合树脂通过立体光刻(SLA)制成。义齿牙用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)磨料浆进行三体磨损试验。使用带有定制子弹形铣削氧化锆探针的莱因费尔德式四工位磨损装置,在1.7Hz频率下施加36 - 40N的加载力,持续200,000次循环。使用实验室级扫描仪和分析软件程序测量最大磨损深度。数据采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey多重比较事后检验(α = 0.05)。
义齿牙材料之间的磨损深度存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。3D打印义齿牙的平均垂直磨损深度(0.016±0.010mm)在统计学上显著小于预制义齿牙。高度交联的义齿牙DCL(0.036±0.011mm)和IPN(0.035±0.014mm)的磨损在统计学上显著小于传统丙烯酸义齿牙。传统丙烯酸义齿牙的磨损最大(0.058±0.014mm)。DCL和IPN之间的磨损深度无显著差异(p > 0.001)。
义齿牙材料显著影响磨损深度。与市售预制义齿牙相比,3D打印义齿牙在与氧化锆对磨时表现出卓越的耐磨性。采用SLA技术制造的义齿牙在口腔修复学领域可能具有广阔的前景。