Daou Elie E, Baba Nadim Z
Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Beirut, Lebanon.
Advanced Specialty Education Program in Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
J Prosthodont. 2021 Dec;30(9):789-794. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13336. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
The fit alteration after ceramic layering of soft Cobalt-Chromium (Co-Cr) and zirconia is poorly documented. This study compared the marginal and internal fit of presintered Co-Cr and zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
Co-Cr master model was prepared and duplicated 60 times to receive three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Sixty dies were prepared, scanned and assigned to 3 groups (n = 20/group), to receive the FDPs made of presintered Co-Cr (CS), presintered zirconia (CZ) and cast Ni-Cr (Wi). Each framework was seated on its specific cast. A replica technique was used for marginal and internal discrepancy measurements in mesiodistal and buccolingual planes. Frameworks were ceramic veneered. Results were compared before and after ceramic layering within each group. Data were analyzed using the Levene, t test, and ANOVA (α = 0.05).
Significant difference was found when gaps were compared within groups for CS and CZ but not for Wi. At the abutments level, significant difference was found for both premolars and molars in the buccolingual planes (p < 0.001). A multiple comparison between materials tested showed significant differences between presintered and cast Ni-Cr. No significant difference was detected between CS and CZ (p = 1.000).
Although ceramic layering increased the discrepancy for presintered Co-Cr and zirconia, the marginal adaptation remained clinically acceptable.
关于软质钴铬(Co-Cr)和氧化锆陶瓷堆塑后的适合性改变,相关文献记载较少。本研究比较了预烧结Co-Cr和氧化锆三单位固定义齿在陶瓷贴面前后的边缘适合性和内部适合性。
制备Co-Cr母模并复制60次,以制作三单位固定义齿(FDPs)。制备60个代型,进行扫描并分为3组(每组n = 20),分别制作预烧结Co-Cr(CS)、预烧结氧化锆(CZ)和铸造镍铬(Wi)材质的FDPs。每个支架就位在其特定的代型上。采用复制技术在近远中平面和颊舌平面测量边缘和内部差异。对支架进行陶瓷贴面。比较每组内陶瓷堆塑前后的结果。使用Levene检验、t检验和方差分析(α = 0.05)对数据进行分析。
比较CS组和CZ组内间隙时发现有显著差异,而Wi组未发现显著差异。在基牙水平,前磨牙和磨牙的颊舌平面均有显著差异(p < 0.001)。对测试材料进行多重比较发现,预烧结材料与铸造镍铬之间存在显著差异。CS组和CZ组之间未检测到显著差异(p = 1.000)。
虽然陶瓷堆塑增加了预烧结Co-Cr和氧化锆的差异,但边缘适合性在临床上仍可接受。