Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 May;43(5):639-650. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.18. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
To investigate risk factors for healthcare worker (HCW) infection in viral respiratory pandemics: severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1. To improve understanding of HCW risk management amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from conception until July 2020 for studies comparing infected HCWs (cases) and noninfected HCWs (controls) and risk factors for infection. Outcomes included HCW types, infection prevention practices, and medical procedures. Pooled effect estimates with pathogen-specific stratified meta-analysis and inverse variance meta-regression analysis were completed. We used the GRADE framework to rate certainty of evidence. (PROSPERO no. CRD42020176232, 6 April 2020.).
In total, 54 comparative studies were included (n = 191,004 HCWs). Compared to nonfrontline HCWs, frontline HCWs were at increased infection risk (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24-2.22), and the risk was greater for HCWs involved in endotracheal intubations (risk difference, 35.2%; 95% CI, 21.4-47.9). Use of gloves, gown, surgical mask, N95 respirator, face protection, and infection training were each strongly protective against infection. Meta-regression showed reduced infection risk in frontline HCWs working in facilities with infection designated wards (OR, -1.04; 95% CI, -1.53 to -0.33, P = .004) and performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in designated centers (OR, -1.30; 95% CI, -2.52 to -0.08; P = .037).
During highly infectious respiratory pandemics, widely available protective measures such as use of gloves, gowns, and face masks are strongly protective against infection and should be instituted, preferably in dedicated settings, to protect frontline HCW during waves of respiratory virus pandemics.
调查医疗工作者(HCW)在病毒性呼吸道大流行中感染的危险因素:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)、中东呼吸综合征(MERS)、SARS-CoV-1、甲型流感 H1N1、H5N1 流感。旨在提高对 COVID-19 大流行期间 HCW 风险管理的理解。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们从构思开始到 2020 年 7 月,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 中心数据库中搜索了比较感染 HCW(病例)和未感染 HCW(对照组)以及感染危险因素的研究。结果包括 HCW 类型、感染预防措施和医疗程序。完成了针对病原体的分层荟萃分析和逆方差荟萃回归分析的汇总效应估计。我们使用 GRADE 框架对证据的确定性进行评级。(PROSPERO 编号:CRD42020176232,2020 年 4 月 6 日)。
共有 54 项比较研究被纳入(n = 191,004 名 HCW)。与非一线 HCW 相比,一线 HCW 的感染风险增加(OR,1.66;95%CI,1.24-2.22),并且参与气管插管的 HCW 的风险更大(风险差异,35.2%;95%CI,21.4-47.9)。使用手套、手术服、外科口罩、N95 口罩、面部保护装置和感染培训都对感染具有很强的保护作用。荟萃回归显示,在设有感染指定病房的设施中工作的一线 HCW 和在指定中心进行气溶胶生成医疗程序的 HCW 感染风险降低(OR,-1.04;95%CI,-1.53 至-0.33,P =.004)和(OR,-1.30;95%CI,-2.52 至-0.08;P =.037)。
在高度传染性的呼吸道大流行期间,广泛使用的防护措施,如使用手套、手术服和口罩,对感染具有很强的保护作用,应在专门场所实施,以在呼吸道病毒大流行期间保护一线 HCW。