Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Room 529, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 400, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Feb;41:377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
The US News and World Report (USNWR) conducts an annual review of popular diets: Moderate (reducing energy intake from all food groups, particularly those high in fat and added sugars); Plant-based (excluding food groups, such as animal products); Low-carbohydrate (excluding/limiting carbohydrate-containing foods); and Meal-replacement diets (replacing foods with pre-made, calorie-controlled portions). The goal of this paper was to examine how these diets differ in nutrients, food groups, and diet quality.
This study examined the 40 diets rated by physicians and nutritionists for the 2018 USNWR and assessed differences among diets that were categorized by two independent reviewers: Moderate (n = 15), Plant-based (n = 12), Low-carbohydrate (n = 8), and Meal replacement (n = 5). Nutrient, food groups, and diet quality (Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®), Healthy Eating Index (HEI)) were assessed from the 2018 USNWR.
There were significant differences among the four diet types for energy; % energy from saturated fat, carbohydrates, and protein; trans fat; sugars; fiber; magnesium; cholesterol; HEI; fruit; total fruit and vegetables; whole grains; total grains; total meat; nuts and seeds; legumes; and total protein foods. Plant-based and Moderate diets, especially the Macrobiotic, Big Loser and Ornish diets, had strongly anti-inflammatory DII scores (-4.82, -4.85 and -4.06, respectively). Moderate (86.9 ± 7.7) and Plant-based (86.1 ± 10.7) diets had significantly higher HEI scores than Low-carbohydrate diets (70.6 ± 15.0; P = 0.01).
These findings provide useful information on nutrient adequacy of popular diets. Results indicate that Plant-based and Moderate diets have better dietary quality (HEI, DII) and better nutrient and food group profiles than Low carbohydrate diets.
《美国新闻与世界报道》(USNWR)每年都会对流行饮食进行一次评估:适度饮食(减少所有食物组的能量摄入,尤其是那些高脂肪和高添加糖的食物);植物性饮食(不包括动物产品等食物组);低碳水化合物饮食(不包括/限制含碳水化合物的食物);以及代餐饮食(用预先制作的、热量控制的部分代替食物)。本文的目的是研究这些饮食在营养、食物组和饮食质量方面的差异。
本研究检查了 2018 年 USNWR 被医生和营养师评为的 40 种饮食,并由两位独立评审员对饮食进行分类:适度饮食(n=15)、植物性饮食(n=12)、低碳水化合物饮食(n=8)和代餐饮食(n=5)。从 2018 年 USNWR 中评估营养素、食物组和饮食质量(饮食炎症指数(DII®)、健康饮食指数(HEI))。
四种饮食类型之间在能量;饱和脂肪、碳水化合物和蛋白质的能量百分比;反式脂肪;糖;纤维;镁;胆固醇;HEI;水果;总水果和蔬菜;全谷物;总谷物;总肉;坚果和种子;豆类;以及总蛋白质食物方面存在显著差异。植物性和适度饮食,尤其是宏营养、大减肥和奥尼什饮食,具有强烈的抗炎 DII 评分(分别为-4.82、-4.85 和-4.06)。适度(86.9±7.7)和植物性(86.1±10.7)饮食的 HEI 评分显著高于低碳水化合物饮食(70.6±15.0;P=0.01)。
这些发现为流行饮食的营养充足性提供了有用的信息。结果表明,与低碳水化合物饮食相比,植物性和适度饮食具有更好的饮食质量(HEI、DII)和更好的营养和食物组特征。