• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定领域元认知意识量表(MCAS-DS):在瑞文标准推理测验过程中评估元认知意识

Metacognitive Awareness Scale, Domain Specific (MCAS-DS): Assessing Metacognitive Awareness During Raven's Progressive Matrices.

作者信息

Song John H H, Loyal Sasha, Lond Benjamin

机构信息

Division of Psychology, School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:607577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607577. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607577
PMID:33488467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7815758/
Abstract

Metacognition, the cognition about cognition, is closely linked to intelligence and therefore understanding the metacognitive processes underlying intelligence test performance, specifically on Raven's Progressive Matrices, could help advance the knowledge about intelligence. The measurement of metacognition, is often done using domain-general offline questionnaires or domain-specific online think-aloud protocols. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between metacognitive awareness and intelligence via the design and use of a novel Meta-Cognitive Awareness Scale - Domain Specific (MCAS-DS) that encourages reflection of task strategy processes. This domain-specific scale was first constructed to measure participants' awareness of their own metacognition linked to Raven's Progressive Matrices (SPM). Following discriminatory index and Exploratory Factor Analysis, a 15-item scale was derived. Exploratory Factor Analysis showed five factors: Awareness of Engagement in Self-Monitoring, Awareness of Own Ability, Awareness of Responding Speed/Time, Awareness of Alternative Solutions and Awareness of Requisite Problem-Solving Resources. The intelligence level of ninety-eight adults was then estimated using Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Participants also completed the MCAS-DS, and further items that examined their test-taking behavior and Confidence level. Metacognitive awareness was positively correlated to standardized IQ scores derived from the SPM whilst Over-Confidence derived using the Confidence level measure was negatively correlated to SPM. Despite some limitations, this study shows promise for elucidating the relationship between metacognitive awareness and intelligence using the task-specific scale.

摘要

元认知,即对认知的认知,与智力密切相关。因此,理解智力测试表现背后的元认知过程,特别是瑞文渐进矩阵测验中的元认知过程,有助于增进对智力的认识。元认知的测量通常使用领域通用的离线问卷或领域特定的在线出声思考协议。本研究旨在通过设计和使用一种新颖的特定领域元认知意识量表(MCAS-DS)来研究元认知意识与智力之间的关系,该量表鼓励对任务策略过程进行反思。这个特定领域的量表最初是为了测量参与者与瑞文标准渐进矩阵测验(SPM)相关的自身元认知意识而构建的。经过区分指数和探索性因素分析,得出了一个包含15个条目的量表。探索性因素分析显示出五个因素:自我监控参与意识、自身能力意识、反应速度/时间意识、替代解决方案意识和必要问题解决资源意识。然后使用瑞文标准渐进矩阵测验对98名成年人的智力水平进行评估。参与者还完成了MCAS-DS以及其他考察他们考试行为和信心水平的条目。元认知意识与从SPM得出的标准化智商分数呈正相关,而使用信心水平测量得出的过度自信与SPM呈负相关。尽管存在一些局限性,但本研究显示了使用特定任务量表阐明元认知意识与智力之间关系的前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/3a85a232c883/fpsyg-11-607577-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/6e35d08249d2/fpsyg-11-607577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/390699a241a2/fpsyg-11-607577-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/a8ce40bd66ef/fpsyg-11-607577-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/f2e880d9251d/fpsyg-11-607577-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/f94ff4b0d082/fpsyg-11-607577-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/71a41b9e11d1/fpsyg-11-607577-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/3a85a232c883/fpsyg-11-607577-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/6e35d08249d2/fpsyg-11-607577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/390699a241a2/fpsyg-11-607577-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/a8ce40bd66ef/fpsyg-11-607577-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/f2e880d9251d/fpsyg-11-607577-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/f94ff4b0d082/fpsyg-11-607577-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/71a41b9e11d1/fpsyg-11-607577-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62b/7815758/3a85a232c883/fpsyg-11-607577-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Metacognitive Awareness Scale, Domain Specific (MCAS-DS): Assessing Metacognitive Awareness During Raven's Progressive Matrices.特定领域元认知意识量表(MCAS-DS):在瑞文标准推理测验过程中评估元认知意识
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:607577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607577. eCollection 2020.
2
Intraindividual strategy shifts in Raven's matrices, and their dependence on working memory capacity and need for cognition.个体在瑞文标准推理测验中的策略转变,及其对工作记忆容量和认知需求的依赖性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):564-579. doi: 10.1037/xge0000660. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
How to gain eleven IQ points in ten minutes: thinking aloud improves Raven's Matrices performance in older adults.如何在十分钟内提高 11 个智商点:出声思维提高老年人瑞文推理测验的成绩。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2010 Mar;17(2):191-204. doi: 10.1080/13825580903042668. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
4
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
5
Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices as a measure of cognitive functioning in Cerebral Palsy.瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验作为衡量脑瘫患者认知功能的一种方法。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 May;52(Pt 5):437-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01045.x. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
6
Visual/verbal-analytic reasoning bias as a function of self-reported autistic-like traits: a study of typically developing individuals solving Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.作为自我报告的自闭症样特征的函数的视觉/言语分析推理偏差:典型个体解决瑞文高级推理测验的研究。
Autism. 2011 May;15(3):327-40. doi: 10.1177/1362361310371798. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
7
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
8
Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: the more difficult the item, the more more is better.工作记忆容量和流体能力:项目越难,效果越好。
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 21;5:239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00239. eCollection 2014.
9
IQ score gains over 65 years worldwide: Cross-temporal meta-analysis datasets.全球65年来智商分数的提升:跨时间元分析数据集。
Data Brief. 2019 Nov 26;28:104884. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104884. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Focal brain lesions and intelligence: a study with a new version of Raven's Colored Matrices.局灶性脑损伤与智力:一项使用新版瑞文彩色推理测验的研究
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986 Jan;8(1):37-50. doi: 10.1080/01688638608401295.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving cognitive function in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD through computerized working memory training.通过计算机化工作记忆训练提高中国 ADHD 和/或 RD 儿童的认知功能。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02065-1.
2
Relationship Between Metacognitive Awareness of Undergraduate Students and Students' Academic Performance at Vietnam Military Medical University.越南军事医科大学本科生元认知意识与学业成绩的关系
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 17;14:791-801. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S412912. eCollection 2023.
3
Developing the Metacognitive Awareness of Grit Scale for a better understanding of learners of English as a foreign language.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroticism Predicts Reasoning Performance in Young but Not Older Adults.神经质预测年轻人的推理表现,但不能预测老年人的推理表现。
Exp Aging Res. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):236-243. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2020.1743615. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition.对元认知测量的反应性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02755. eCollection 2019.
3
Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.控制自我报告量表中的反应偏差:迫选法与李克特项目的心理测量模型
开发毅力的元认知意识量表以更好地理解作为外语的英语学习者。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1141214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141214. eCollection 2023.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309. eCollection 2019.
4
Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect.明智之举:澄清元认知在邓宁-克鲁格效应中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Nov;148(11):1882-1897. doi: 10.1037/xge0000579. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements.思考思维:基于坐标的元认知判断神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2:2398212818810591. doi: 10.1177/2398212818810591. eCollection 2018.
6
Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.跨领域的人类元认知:来自个体差异和神经成像的见解
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.16. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
7
Are there Sex Differences in Confidence and Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy for Everyday, Academic, and Psychometrically Measured Spatial Ability?在日常、学术以及心理测量的空间能力方面,自信和元认知监测准确性是否存在性别差异?
Intelligence. 2018 Sep-Oct;70:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
Fluid intelligence and gross structural properties of the cerebral cortex in middle-aged and older adults: A multi-occasion longitudinal study.中年和老年人的大脑皮质的流动智力和总结构特性:一项多次观察的纵向研究。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
9
Distinct neural substrates of visuospatial and verbal-analytic reasoning as assessed by Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.根据瑞文高级推理测验评估的视空间和言语分析推理的不同神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16230. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16437-8.
10
Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning.元推理:思维和推理的监控与控制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 15.