Gómez Ángel, Martínez Mercedes, Martel Francois Alexi, López-Rodríguez Lucía, Vázquez Alexandra, Chinchilla Juana, Paredes Borja, Hettiarachchi Mal, Hamid Nafees, Swann William B
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
ARTIS International, St. Michaels, MD, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:614657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614657. eCollection 2020.
We distinguish two pathways people may follow when they join violent groups: compliance and internalization. Compliance occurs when individuals are coerced to join by powerful influence agents. Internalization occurs when individuals join due to a perceived convergence between the self and the group. We searched for evidence of each of these pathways in field investigations of former members of two renowned terrorist organizations: the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) (Study 1) and Islamist radical groups (Study 2). Results indicated that ex-fighters joined LTTE for reasons associated with both compliance and internalization but that ex-fighters joined Islamist radical groups primarily for reasons associated with internalization. When compliance occurred, it often took the form of coercion within LTTE but involved charismatic persuasion agents within Islamist groups. This evidence of systematic differences in the reasons why fighters enter violent groups suggests that strategies for preventing radicalization and fostering de-radicalization should be tailored to particular groups.
顺从和内化。当个人受到强大影响因素的胁迫而加入时,就会出现顺从。当个人由于自身与该组织之间的认知趋同而加入时,就会出现内化。我们在对两个著名恐怖组织的前成员进行的实地调查中寻找了这两种途径的证据:泰米尔伊拉姆猛虎解放组织(猛虎组织)(研究1)和伊斯兰激进组织(研究2)。结果表明,前战斗人员加入猛虎组织的原因既有顺从也有内化,但前战斗人员加入伊斯兰激进组织主要是出于与内化相关的原因。当出现顺从时,在猛虎组织中通常表现为胁迫形式,但在伊斯兰组织中则涉及有魅力的说服者。战斗人员加入暴力组织的原因存在系统性差异的这一证据表明,预防激进化和促进去激进化的策略应针对特定群体量身定制。