Bélanger Jocelyn J, Moyano Manuel, Muhammad Hayat, Richardson Lindsy, Lafrenière Marc-André K, McCaffery Patrick, Framand Karyne, Nociti Noëmie
Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 11;10:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00042. eCollection 2019.
The present research examines the social cognitive processes underlying ideologically-based violence through the lens of the 3N model of radicalization. To test this theory, we introduce two new psychometric instruments-a social alienation and a support for political violence scale-developed in collaboration with 13 subject matter experts on terrorism. Using these instruments, we test the theory's hypotheses in four different cultural settings. In Study 1, Canadians reporting high levels of social alienation (Need) expressed greater support for political violence (Narrative), which in turn positively predicted wanting to join a radical group (Network), controlling for other measures related to political violence. Study 2a and 2b replicated these findings in Pakistan and in Spain, respectively. Using an experimental manipulation of social alienation, Study 3 extended these findings with an American sample and demonstrated that moral justification is one of the psychological mechanisms linking social alienation to supporting political violence. Implications and future directions for the psychology of terrorism are discussed.
本研究通过激进化的3N模型视角,考察基于意识形态的暴力背后的社会认知过程。为了检验这一理论,我们引入了两种新的心理测量工具——一种社会疏离感量表和一种政治暴力支持量表——这是与13位恐怖主义主题专家合作开发的。利用这些工具,我们在四种不同的文化背景下检验了该理论的假设。在研究1中,报告社会疏离感(需求)程度高的加拿大人对政治暴力(叙事)表现出更大的支持,这反过来又正向预测了想要加入激进组织(网络)的意愿,同时控制了与政治暴力相关的其他指标。研究2a和2b分别在巴基斯坦和西班牙重复了这些发现。通过对社会疏离感的实验性操纵,研究3用美国样本扩展了这些发现,并表明道德正当性是将社会疏离感与支持政治暴力联系起来的心理机制之一。本文还讨论了恐怖主义心理学的意义和未来方向。