Coakley Anne, Wu Matthew J, Kumar Jayanth, Dadrass Farinoosh, Tao Joy, Moy Lauren, Webb Kirsten, Lee Kristin
Ms. Coakley, Mr. Wu, Mr. Kumar, and Ms. Dadrass are with Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine at Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Illinois.
Drs. Tao, Moy, Webb, are with the Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine at Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Illinois.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020 Dec;13(12):32-37. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Acrochordon (skin tag) removal by snip excision is a routine dermatologic procedure. Bleeding is a common sequelae of snip excision that requires hemostatic control. Chemical cautery is a common means of achieving hemostasis in this procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different chemical cautery solutions for their time to hemostasis, pain upon application, and associated pigmentary changes. Twelve patients with six or more skin tags on the bilateral neck and/or axilla were enrolled. Two skin tags were cauterized with ferric subsulfate solution, two with silver nitrate, and two with aluminum chloride hexahydrate solution. Time to hemostasis and pain with application of each cautery solution to the skin tag was recorded. At a two-week follow-up appointment, patient satisfaction was assessed with a survey, and pigmentary changes were documented with digital photography. There was no significant variability in the time to hemostasis among the three chemical cautery solutions (=0.57). Pain response was significantly different among the three solutions (=0.003). Compared to silver nitrate (median=6.00, interquartile range [IQR]: 4.50-6.50), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (median=1.00, IQR: 0.50 to 6.00; Sidak =0.02) and ferric subsulfate (median=1.50, IQR: 0.00-3.50; Sidak =0.01) had a significantly lower pain response. Among participants, three (25%) experienced a pigmentary change with ferric subsulfate, two (17%) with aluminum chloride, and six (50%) with silver nitrate (overall = 0.14). These results indicate that the three standard chemical cautery solutions for skin tag snip excision have significant differences in pain upon application and pigmentary changes. This might be a relevant consideration when selecting a chemical cautery solution.
通过剪除法切除皮赘是一种常规的皮肤科手术。出血是剪除法切除术后常见的后遗症,需要进行止血控制。化学烧灼是该手术中实现止血的常用方法。本研究的目的是评估三种不同的化学烧灼溶液在止血时间、涂抹时的疼痛程度以及相关色素沉着变化方面的情况。招募了12名双侧颈部和/或腋窝有6个或更多皮赘的患者。用硫酸铁溶液烧灼两个皮赘,用硝酸银烧灼两个,用六水合氯化铝溶液烧灼两个。记录每种烧灼溶液涂抹在皮赘上的止血时间和疼痛情况。在两周的随访预约中,通过问卷调查评估患者满意度,并用数码摄影记录色素沉着变化。三种化学烧灼溶液在止血时间上没有显著差异(=0.57)。三种溶液的疼痛反应有显著差异(=0.003)。与硝酸银相比(中位数=6.00,四分位间距[IQR]:4.50 - 6.50),六水合氯化铝(中位数=1.00,IQR:0.50至6.00;Sidak =0.02)和硫酸铁(中位数=1.50,IQR:0.00 - 3.50;Sidak =0.01)的疼痛反应明显更低。在参与者中,三名(25%)使用硫酸铁后出现色素沉着变化,两名(17%)使用六水合氯化铝后出现,六名(50%)使用硝酸银后出现(总体=0.14)。这些结果表明,用于皮赘剪除法切除的三种标准化学烧灼溶液在涂抹时的疼痛程度和色素沉着变化方面存在显著差异。这在选择化学烧灼溶液时可能是一个需要考虑的重要因素。