Rehman Hareem, Abid Adeel, Awan Safia, Hashmi Farheen L, Abid Shahab
Medicine, Aga Khan Health Service, Karachi, PAK.
Internal Medicine, Aga Khan Health Service, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):e12088. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12088.
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in a Pakistani population. It also evaluates the outcomes of management of patients with esophageal dysphagia and no structural abnormality on endoscopy. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. Patients with symptoms of dysphagia with normal endoscopy were subjected to esophageal manometry and to barium swallow as a part of routine workup. Esophageal motility disorders diagnosed by HRM were compared to barium swallow findings. A follow-up of these patients was done after a one-year interval to evaluate improvement in their symptoms. Results A total of 202 patients underwent HRM. There were abnormal findings in 160 patients (79.2%) with achalasia being the most common diagnosis in 35.6% of the total patients. Out of 72 patients diagnosed to have achalasia on HRM, only 46 (32.6%) had similar findings on barium esophagram and this difference is statistically significant, p < 0.001). Among achalasia patients, laparoscopic surgery was performed in 22 (30.5%) patients with 59% patients reporting a good to excellent improvement (>50%) in their symptoms, balloon dilatations were done in 47 (65.27%) patients with a good to excellent improvement in symptoms in 55% patients. Only three patients (5.5%) were given botulinum toxin injections, and two of them had an improvement of >50% in their symptoms. Patients with motility disorders other than achalasia were treated with a combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), calcium channel blockers and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusion Achalasia was the most common esophageal motility disorder in our population. HRM can diagnose significantly more patients with achalasia compared to barium swallow. Likewise, HRM was helpful in detecting other esophageal motility disorders and planning their management.
目的 本研究旨在评估高分辨率食管测压(HRM)在诊断巴基斯坦人群食管动力障碍中的结果。本研究还评估了内镜检查无结构异常的食管吞咽困难患者的治疗结果。方法 这是一项横断面研究。有吞咽困难症状且内镜检查正常的患者接受食管测压和吞钡检查,作为常规检查的一部分。将HRM诊断的食管动力障碍与吞钡检查结果进行比较。对这些患者进行为期一年的随访,以评估其症状的改善情况。结果 共有202例患者接受了HRM检查。160例患者(79.2%)有异常发现,贲门失弛缓症是最常见的诊断,占总患者数的35.6%。在HRM诊断为贲门失弛缓症的72例患者中,只有46例(32.6%)在食管钡餐造影上有类似发现,这种差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。在贲门失弛缓症患者中,22例(30.5%)患者接受了腹腔镜手术,59%的患者报告症状有良好至极佳的改善(>50%);47例(65.27%)患者进行了球囊扩张,55%的患者症状有良好至极佳的改善。只有3例患者(5.5%)接受了肉毒杆菌毒素注射,其中2例症状改善>50%。除贲门失弛缓症外的动力障碍患者接受质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、钙通道阻滞剂和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)联合治疗。结论 贲门失弛缓症是我国人群中最常见的食管动力障碍。与吞钡检查相比,HRM能诊断出更多的贲门失弛缓症患者。同样,HRM有助于检测其他食管动力障碍并规划其治疗。