Nakanishi Ryosuke, Takeuchi Kosuke, Akizuki Kazunori, Nakagoshi Ryoma, Kakihana Hironobu
Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe International University.
Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Osaka Medical College.
Phys Ther Res. 2020 Sep 15;23(2):195-201. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10030. eCollection 2020.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been noted as an effective pre- contraction for an increase of neural and muscle factors during twitch contractions. However, it is unknown if this intervention is effective for the rate of force development (RFD), which is the ability to increase joint torque strength as quickly as possible, during tetanic contractions. NMES can be safely used by anyone, but, the strength setting of NMES requires attention so as not to cause pain. Therefore, the purpose of this study investigated whether NMES at less painful levels was effective for RFD during tetanic contractions. We also investigated effect activation by analyzing electromyogram (EMG) and RFD for each phase.
Eighteen healthy males were studied. Before and after NMES intervention at 10% or 20% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) level (10%NMES, 20%NMES respectively), EMG activity and the initial phase (30-, 50-, 100-, and 200-msec) RFD were measured. Visual analog scale (VAS) was also measured as an indicator of pain during each NMES.
20%NMES increased EMG activity and 30-, 50-, and 100-msec of RFD during MVIC, but could not improve 200 msec of RFD. However, 10%NMES could be failed to increase all phases RFD, but VAS was lower than that of 20% NMES.
These results suggest that muscle pre-contraction using 20%NMES could induce moderate pain, but could be an effective intervention to improve RFD via neural factor activity.
神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)已被视为一种有效的预收缩方式,可在单收缩期间增加神经和肌肉因子。然而,在强直收缩期间,这种干预措施对力量发展速率(RFD)是否有效尚不清楚,力量发展速率是指尽快增加关节扭矩强度的能力。任何人都可以安全使用NMES,但NMES的强度设置需要注意,以免引起疼痛。因此,本研究的目的是调查在疼痛程度较轻的情况下,NMES对强直收缩期间的RFD是否有效。我们还通过分析每个阶段的肌电图(EMG)和RFD来研究其激活效果。
对18名健康男性进行研究。在10%或20%最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)水平(分别为10%NMES、20%NMES)进行NMES干预前后,测量EMG活动和初始阶段(30、50、100和200毫秒)的RFD。还测量了视觉模拟量表(VAS),作为每次NMES期间疼痛的指标。
20%NMES在MVIC期间增加了EMG活动以及30、50和100毫秒时的RFD,但未能改善200毫秒时的RFD。然而,10%NMES未能增加所有阶段的RFD,但VAS低于20%NMES。
这些结果表明,使用20%NMES进行肌肉预收缩可能会引起中度疼痛,但可能是一种通过神经因子活动改善RFD的有效干预措施。