Zeng Ziyi, Chen Chen, Guo Lanlan, Zhang Cheng, Chen Lei, Yuan Chuanping, Lu Lixia
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 7;10:600429. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.600429. eCollection 2020.
The present study aimed to explore the optimal chemotherapy strategy for locoregionally advanced children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LcaNPC), based on the level of pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA (pEBV-DNA) in the era of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
This real-world, retrospective study consecutively reviewed locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients younger than 22 years old from 2006 to 2016 in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and the Cox regression model were used to investigate the survival outcomes of different chemotherapy intensities and pEBV-DNA. Treatment-related toxicity was also evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.
A total of 179 patients were enrolled, including 86 patients in the high-risk group (pEBV-DNA ≥7,500 copies/ml) and 93 patients in the low-risk group (pEBV-DNA <7,500 copies/ml). Among all patients, those receiving low intensity induction chemotherapy (IC courses = 2) had a better 5-year overall survival (OS) than those receiving no IC (P = 0.025) and high intensity IC (IC courses >2) (P = 0.044). In the high-risk group, receipt of low intensity IC showed significant 5-year OS (P = 0.032), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.027), and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P = 0.008) benefits compared with not receiving IC. Multivariate analyses identified that not receiving IC was a risk factor compared with low intensity IC for OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 10.933, P = 0.038) among all patients. Moreover, in the high-risk group, not receiving IC was a risk factor for 5-year OS (HR = 10.878, P = 0.038), 5-year PFS (HR = 5.705, P = 0.041), and 5-year DMFS (HR = 10.290, P = 0.040) compared to low intensity IC. There were no differences in survival for patients treated with or without concurrent chemotherapy.
Two courses of platinum-based IC might be the optimal induction chemotherapy intensity to reduce risk of death, progression, and distant metastasis in patients with high pEBV-DNA levels.
本研究旨在基于调强放射治疗(IMRT)时代的治疗前血浆爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒DNA(pEBV-DNA)水平,探索局部区域晚期儿童和青少年鼻咽癌(LcaNPC)的最佳化疗策略。
这项真实世界的回顾性研究连续纳入了2006年至2016年在中山大学肿瘤防治中心就诊的年龄小于22岁的局部区域晚期鼻咽癌患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法及对数秩检验和Cox回归模型来研究不同化疗强度和pEBV-DNA水平患者的生存结局。还使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验评估治疗相关毒性。
共纳入179例患者,其中高危组(pEBV-DNA≥7500拷贝/ml)86例,低危组(pEBV-DNA<7500拷贝/ml)93例。在所有患者中,接受低强度诱导化疗(IC疗程=2)的患者5年总生存(OS)率优于未接受IC化疗的患者(P=0.025)和高强度IC化疗(IC疗程>2)的患者(P=0.044)。在高危组中,与未接受IC化疗相比,接受低强度IC化疗的患者5年OS(P=0.032)、无进展生存(PFS)(P=0.027)和5年无远处转移生存(DMFS)(P=0.008)均有显著获益。多因素分析确定,在所有患者中,与低强度IC化疗相比,未接受IC化疗是OS的危险因素(风险比(HR)=10.933,P=0.038)。此外,在高危组中,与低强度IC化疗相比,未接受IC化疗是5年OS(HR=10.878,P=0.038)、5年PFS(HR=5.705,P=0.041)和5年DMFS(HR=10.290,P=0.040)的危险因素。接受或未接受同步化疗的患者生存情况无差异。
两疗程铂类IC化疗可能是降低高pEBV-DNA水平患者死亡、进展和远处转移风险的最佳诱导化疗强度。