Xia Xiaojie, Liu Zeyuan, Qin Qin, Di Xiaoke, Zhang Zhaoyue, Sun Xinchen, Ge Xiaolin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 7;10:604657. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604657. eCollection 2020.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for nonsurgical esophageal cancer (EC). However, esophageal cancer patients receiving CCRT alone are still unsatisfactory in terms of local control and overall survival (OS) benefit. Clinicians generally add consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT. It remains controversial whether CCT following CCRT is beneficial for esophageal cancer. We, therefore, undertook a meta-analysis to assess the need for CCT in inoperable esophageal cancer.
We combed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for relevant published articles up to July 2020 that compared CCRT plus CCT to CCRT alone for patients with nonsurgical EC. Our primary endpoint was OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was treatment toxicity. We analyzed the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the time-to-event data and the odds ratio (OR) to compare the treatment-related effect. To assess heterogeneity, we performed the I test and examined publication bias using funnel plots analysis.
The 11 retrospective studies involved 2008 patients. Of these 2008 patients, 1018 received CCRT plus CCT, and 990 received CCRT. Compared to CCRT alone, CCT after CCRT did not improve disease control rate (DCR) (OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.53-5.15, p=0.384) and objective response rate (ORR) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.62-3.35, p=0.393). However, OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.86, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.84, p=0.003) did increase. Our results show that CCT plus CCRT had a clear survival advantage over CCRT alone. The risk of treatment toxicity did not increase for EC patients who received CCT.
CCT after CCRT significantly increases OS and PFS in patients with nonsurgical EC and could provide them remarkable survival benefits. The results provide an evidence-based framework for the use of CCT after CCRT.
同步放化疗(CCRT)是不可手术食管癌(EC)的标准治疗方法。然而,单纯接受CCRT的食管癌患者在局部控制和总生存期(OS)获益方面仍不尽人意。临床医生通常在CCRT后加用巩固化疗(CCT)。CCRT后进行CCT对食管癌是否有益仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估不可手术食管癌患者是否需要CCT。
我们检索了截至2020年7月的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和中国知网,查找将CCRT联合CCT与单纯CCRT用于不可手术EC患者的相关已发表文章。我们的主要终点是OS和无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点是治疗毒性。我们分析风险比(HR)以估计事件发生时间数据,并分析比值比(OR)以比较治疗相关效应。为评估异质性,我们进行了I检验,并使用漏斗图分析检查发表偏倚。
11项回顾性研究纳入了2008例患者。在这2008例患者中,1018例接受了CCRT联合CCT,990例接受了CCRT。与单纯CCRT相比,CCRT后进行CCT并未提高疾病控制率(DCR)(OR 1.66;95%CI 0.53 - 5.15,p = 0.384)和客观缓解率(ORR)(OR 1.44;95%CI 0.62 - 3.35,p = 0.393)。然而,OS(HR 0.72;95%CI 0.59 - 0.86,p < 0.001)和PFS(HR 0.61;95%CI 0.44 - 0.84,p = 0.003)确实有所提高。我们的结果表明,CCRT联合CCT比单纯CCRT具有明显的生存优势。接受CCT的EC患者治疗毒性风险并未增加。
CCRT后进行CCT可显著提高不可手术EC患者的OS和PFS,并可为他们带来显著的生存获益。这些结果为CCRT后使用CCT提供了一个基于证据的框架。