Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Chengdu, China.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):830-837. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2012437. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
To verify the role of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for bulky and locally advanced cervical cancer, a meta-analysis was performed. Based on articles published up to Jun 2020 a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies. A total of 4 articles consisting of 1659 patients were enrolled. The pooled results revealed that overall survival (OS) of patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT + CT) was significantly superior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88, < .0001). The meta-analysis reviewed that the progression-free survival rate (PFS) of patients treated with CCRT + CT was significantly superior to CCRT alone (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87, < .00001). The pooled results revealed a significant reduction of local recurrence rate for the CCRT + CT group (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, < .00001). The pooled meta-analysis also showed a significant reduction of distant recurrence rate for the CCRT + CT group (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.44-0.69, < .00001). The pooled results of grade 3/4 bone marrow suppression were calculated as OR and presented with a 95% CI (OR = 15.85; 95% CI: 9.48, 26.5, < .00001), indicating patients who received CCRT + CT are more likely to suffer 3/4 bone marrow suppression than those treated with CCRT alone. In conclusion, patients who received chemoradiation with consolidation chemotherapy showed a significantly longer PFS, longer OS, lower local recurrence rate and distant recurrence rate compared to traditional concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Impact statement Since CCRT was recommended as the standard treatment for cervical cancer, there was still a 20-30% chance of local recurrence, and 18-25% of distant recurrence for cervical cancer patients. Aiming to completely eradicate potential undetected micrometastases, consolidation chemotherapy came into the area of interest. We conducted a meta-analysis to verify the role of consolidation chemotherapy in cervical cancer. The addition of consolidation CT resulted in a longer overall survival rate (OS) and progression-free survival rate (PFS), mainly due to control of local and distant relapses, especially the latter one. Toxicity followed consolidation CT increased but still clinically manageable. In the future, we need more clinical studies with high quality to verify the role of consolidation CT in cervical cancer, and further to optimise the criteria for it.
为了验证局部晚期和巨块型宫颈癌同步放化疗后巩固化疗的作用,我们进行了一项荟萃分析。根据截至 2020 年 6 月发表的文章,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了文献检索,以确定合格的研究。共纳入 4 项包含 1659 名患者的研究。汇总结果表明,同步放化疗后接受巩固化疗(CCRT+CT)的患者的总生存(OS)显著优于单纯同步放化疗(CCRT)(HR=0.78,95%CI:0.69-0.88,<0.0001)。荟萃分析显示,接受 CCRT+CT 的患者的无进展生存率(PFS)显著优于 CCRT 单独治疗(HR=0.80,95%CI:0.73-0.87,<0.00001)。汇总结果显示,CCRT+CT 组的局部复发率显著降低(RR=0.66,95%CI:0.55-0.79,<0.00001)。荟萃分析还显示,CCRT+CT 组的远处复发率显著降低(RR=0.55,95%CI:0.44-0.69,<0.00001)。计算出 3/4 级骨髓抑制的汇总结果为比值比(OR),并呈现 95%置信区间(OR=15.85;95%CI:9.48,26.5,<0.00001),表明接受 CCRT+CT 的患者比接受 CCRT 单独治疗的患者更有可能出现 3/4 级骨髓抑制。总之,与传统同步放化疗相比,接受放化疗联合巩固化疗的患者 PFS、OS 更长,局部复发率和远处复发率更低。
由于 CCRT 被推荐为宫颈癌的标准治疗方法,宫颈癌患者仍有 20-30%的局部复发机会和 18-25%的远处复发机会。为了彻底消除潜在的未检测到的微转移,巩固化疗进入了人们关注的领域。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以验证巩固化疗在宫颈癌中的作用。加用巩固 CT 可提高总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS),主要是由于控制了局部和远处复发,尤其是后者。虽然紧随巩固 CT 之后的毒性增加,但仍具有临床可管理性。在未来,我们需要更多高质量的临床研究来验证巩固 CT 在宫颈癌中的作用,并进一步优化其应用标准。