Fam Nevine S, Mohamed Sara H, Gamal Doaa, Wasfy Reham M, Soliman May S, El-Kholy Amani A
MD, Department of Microbiology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, PM Box 30 Imbaba, Giza, Egypt.
PhD, Department of Microbiology, National Organization for Drug Control and Research, Giza, Egypt.
Germs. 2020 Dec 28;10(4):303-309. doi: 10.18683/germs.2020.1222. eCollection 2020 Dec.
is a challenging pathogen responsible for serious nosocomial infections. Colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant strains is a critical health problem as it limits the available therapeutic options. The current work aimed to study the reliability of several phenotypic methods for the detection of colistin resistance among carbapenem-resistant isolates in Egypt.
A total of 22 carbapenem-resistant isolates were recovered. Colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution (BMD) and compared to agar dilution (AD), automated system (VITEK-2) and gradient test (E-test) and were analyzed by statistical methods.
Phenotypic testing showed that nine of 22 isolates (40.9%) were colistin-resistant by BMD and seven of them were also resistant by AD, with the categorical agreement (CA) of 72.7% and essential agreement (EA) of 90.9%. Colistin MIC results ranged from 1-8 µg/mL and 1-32 µg/mL by both AD and BMD respectively. Detection of colistin resistance by gradient test and automated system showed high very major error (VME) rates (40.9%) compared to BMD with a lack of CA between them. AD gave moderate agreement with BMD by 90.9% EA, 72.7% CA and only 9.1% VME.
In delineating colistin breakpoints BMD followed by AD method are defined as the only reliable phenotypic methods for colistin resistance evaluation. More rapid and reliable tests, other than BMD and AD, are required for the convenient detection of colistin resistance in the routine clinical microbiology laboratory daily workflow.
是一种具有挑战性的病原体,可导致严重的医院感染。耐碳青霉烯菌株中的黏菌素耐药性是一个关键的健康问题,因为它限制了可用的治疗选择。当前的工作旨在研究几种表型方法在检测埃及耐碳青霉烯分离株中黏菌素耐药性方面的可靠性。
共分离出22株耐碳青霉烯分离株。使用肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)测定黏菌素最低抑菌浓度(MIC),并与琼脂稀释法(AD)、自动化系统(VITEK-2)和梯度试验(E-test)进行比较,并采用统计方法进行分析。
表型测试表明,22株分离株中有9株(40.9%)通过BMD检测为黏菌素耐药,其中7株通过AD检测也耐药,分类一致性(CA)为72.7%,基本一致性(EA)为90.9%。AD和BMD测定的黏菌素MIC结果分别为1-8μg/mL和1-32μg/mL。与BMD相比,梯度试验和自动化系统检测黏菌素耐药性的极高错误率(VME)为40.9%,且两者之间缺乏CA。AD与BMD的一致性中等,EA为90.9%,CA为72.7%,VME仅为9.1%。
在确定黏菌素断点时,BMD随后是AD方法被定义为评估黏菌素耐药性的唯一可靠表型方法。在日常临床微生物实验室工作流程中,需要除BMD和AD之外更快速可靠的检测方法来方便地检测黏菌素耐药性。