Chung Hae-Sun, Kim Soo-Kyung, Hahm Chorong, Lee Miae
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07985, Korea.
Ewha Education and Research Center for Infection, Seoul 07985, Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;12(6):1487. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061487.
Performances of the colistin antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems of vary depending on the manufacturer, and data on colistin-resistant are limited. We evaluated the VITEK2 and Sensititre systems to determine colistin resistance and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for isolated from a clinical microbiology laboratory. A total of 213 clinical isolates were tested, including 81 colistin-resistant . ASTs were performed using the VITEK2 and Sensititre systems according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reference MICs for colistin were determined using the manual broth microdilution method (BMD). The results of the two AST methods were compared with the BMD results. VITEK2 and Sensititre systems showed category agreements of 95.3% and 99.1%, respectively. VITEK2 had a relatively high very major error (VME) rate (9.9%). Sensititre reported higher MICs than the reference method for the susceptible isolates and showed low essential agreement. In conclusion, the automated systems investigated in this study showed good category agreements for colistin AST of . However, VITEK2 had a high VME rate, and Sensititre had differences in MIC results. Colistin AST remains a challenging task in the clinical laboratory.
不同厂家的黏菌素抗菌药敏试验(AST)系统性能各异,且关于耐黏菌素的数据有限。我们评估了VITEK2和Sensititre系统,以确定从临床微生物实验室分离出的[细菌名称未给出]的黏菌素耐药性和最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。共检测了213株临床[细菌名称未给出]分离株,其中包括81株耐黏菌素的[细菌名称未给出]。按照厂家说明,使用VITEK2和Sensititre系统进行AST检测。采用手工肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)确定黏菌素的参考MIC。将两种AST方法的结果与BMD结果进行比较。VITEK2和Sensititre系统的类别符合率分别为95.3%和99.1%。VITEK2的极重大误差(VME)率相对较高(9.9%)。对于敏感分离株,Sensititre报告的MIC高于参考方法,且基本符合率较低。总之,本研究中调查的自动化系统在[细菌名称未给出]的黏菌素AST方面显示出良好的类别符合率。然而,VITEK2的VME率较高,Sensititre的MIC结果存在差异。在临床实验室中,黏菌素AST仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。