• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

58例乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的临床特征、预后及影响因素

Clinical features, prognosis, and influencing factors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in 58 patients with breast cancer.

作者信息

Zheng Yiqiong, Li Jie, Hong Chenyan, Wu Huan, Lige Wuri, Qi Aiying, Guo Jin, Wang Jiandong, Zhu Li, Li Xiru, Zhang Yanjun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.

School of Medicine, Naikai University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1665. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7780.

DOI:10.21037/atm-20-7780
PMID:33490177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7812232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have witnessed the increasing application of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for women with breast cancer in the western countries. Over 30% of young patients choose to underwent CPM up to 2015. However, the adoption rate of CPM has not shown a remarkably increasing in Asian countries. In China, only a few centers have introduced CPM, and no relevant literature has been published. In this study, we look forward to identify the clinical features and prognostic factors of women who underwent CPM in our hospital, to inform decision-making processes for both doctors and patients.

METHODS

The clinical data of 58 eligible patients were retrospectively analyzed. Intergroup comparisons were based on independent samples -test and chi square test. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were obtained by using life tables, and factors affecting the survivals were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The mean age of these women was 40.14±11.17 years, with 30 patients (51.7%) being ≤40 years; 13 patients (22.4%) had a family history of breast cancer; and 49 (69.0%) had known risk factors for breast cancer. The median follow-up period was 66.77 months, the 5-year OS was 89% and the 5-year DFS was 74%. The average age of onset was 41.53 (±10.964) in the disease-free survival group and 34.18 (±10.4) years in the recurrence/metastasis group, and -test revealed a significant difference in the average age between these two groups (P=0.049). Chi-square test showed that the disease progression rate significantly differed among the different age subgroups and among subjects with different body mass index (BMI) (all P≤0.05). Moreover, surgical procedure, family history of breast cancer, and some other factors showed no significant correlation with disease progression (all P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log rank test further confirmed the above findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who choose CPM are young and with known risk factors for breast cancer. Part of the young patients (≤40 years of age) are at a higher risk of disease progression.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中,西方国家乳腺癌女性对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的应用日益增加。截至2015年,超过30%的年轻患者选择接受CPM。然而,CPM在亚洲国家的采用率并未显著增加。在中国,只有少数中心引入了CPM,且尚无相关文献发表。在本研究中,我们期望确定在我院接受CPM的女性的临床特征和预后因素,为医生和患者的决策过程提供参考。

方法

回顾性分析58例符合条件患者的临床资料。组间比较采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验。采用寿命表法计算5年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS),并采用Kaplan-Meier法分析影响生存率的因素。

结果

这些女性的平均年龄为40.14±11.17岁,其中30例(51.7%)年龄≤40岁;13例(22.4%)有乳腺癌家族史;49例(69.0%)有已知的乳腺癌危险因素。中位随访期为66.77个月,5年OS为89%,5年DFS为74%。无病生存组的平均发病年龄为41.53(±10.964)岁,复发/转移组为34.18(±10.4)岁,t检验显示两组平均年龄有显著差异(P=0.049)。卡方检验表明,不同年龄亚组和不同体重指数(BMI)的受试者疾病进展率有显著差异(均P≤0.05)。此外,手术方式、乳腺癌家族史和其他一些因素与疾病进展无显著相关性(均P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析和对数秩检验进一步证实了上述结果。

结论

选择CPM的大多数患者为年轻女性且有已知的乳腺癌危险因素。部分年轻患者(≤40岁)疾病进展风险较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2f/7812232/f8de2bb7358d/atm-08-24-1665-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2f/7812232/f8de2bb7358d/atm-08-24-1665-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2f/7812232/f8de2bb7358d/atm-08-24-1665-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical features, prognosis, and influencing factors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in 58 patients with breast cancer.58例乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的临床特征、预后及影响因素
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1665. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7780.
2
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in Chinese female population: a retrospective cohort study.中国女性人群单侧乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1668-1685. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-384. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy provides no survival benefit in young women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术对雌激素受体阴性的年轻乳腺癌女性患者并无生存获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3231-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3956-3. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
4
Trend and survival benefit of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among men with stage I-III unilateral breast cancer in the USA, 1998-2016.美国 1998-2016 年 I-III 期单侧乳腺癌男性患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的趋势和生存获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Dec;190(3):503-515. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06397-z. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.BRCA 突变携带者的双侧预防性乳房切除术:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:1-2.
6
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a rural population: A single-institution experience.农村人口的对侧预防性乳房切除术:单机构经验
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Feb 23;18:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients.对比乳腺癌患者接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧全乳房切除术的患者特征和结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2600-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2299-1. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
8
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
9
Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction.对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素及其对乳房重建的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S153-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000099.
10
Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用日益增加,尽管对浸润性乳腺癌的长期生存并无改善。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698.

引用本文的文献

1
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in young versus elderly patients.保留乳头的乳房切除术:年轻患者与老年患者的比较。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Oct 23;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90. eCollection 2024.
2
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in Chinese female population: a retrospective cohort study.中国女性人群单侧乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1668-1685. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-384. Epub 2023 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Second primary breast cancer after unilateral mastectomy alone or with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.单侧乳房切除术或对侧预防性乳房切除术治疗后的第二原发乳腺癌。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):8043-8052. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3394. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
Contralateral Breast Cancer and Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Carriers and Non-Carriers at High-Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌高危携带者与非携带者的对侧乳腺癌及同侧乳腺肿瘤复发情况
J Breast Cancer. 2019 Dec;22(4):587-598. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e47.
3
Growing Trends of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Reconstruction in Young Breast Cancer.
年轻乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术和重建术的发展趋势。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Mortality after contralateral breast cancer in Denmark.丹麦对侧乳腺癌的死亡率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4846-3. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
5
Differences in breast cancer incidence among young women aged 20-49 years by stage and tumor characteristics, age, race, and ethnicity, 2004-2013.2004-2013 年轻女性(20-49 岁)乳腺癌发病率的差异,包括分期和肿瘤特征、年龄、种族和民族。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):595-606. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4699-9. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.保留乳头和皮肤的乳房切除术:目的、肿瘤安全性和禁忌证的综述。
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures.保留乳头的乳房切除术的肿瘤学安全性:一项对12358例手术进行汇总分析的文献系统综述。
Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Jul;43(4):328-38. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
8
The Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.降低风险手术在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的作用
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):454-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1503523.
9
Perceptions of Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study.对侧乳腺癌风险认知:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3846-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4442-2. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Biology of breast cancer in young women.年轻女性乳腺癌的生物学特性
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 27;16(4):427. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0427-5.