Rehman Yasir, Zhang Cindy, Ye Haolin, Fernandes Lionel, Marek Mathieu, Cretu Andrada, Parkinson William
Health Research Methodology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
AIMS Neurosci. 2020 Nov 25;8(1):47-73. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021003. eCollection 2021.
We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review on elderly survivors of war suffering from PTSD to estimate the variability in their cognitive impairment based on individual neuropsychological tests.
We included case control studies that explored the association of cognitive deficits in elderly PTSD civilian survivor of wars (age >60 years), using MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from the inception to January 2018. We compared the cognitive performances in three comparisons i) PTSD+ vs. PTSD- civilian survivors of war; ii) PTSD+ vs. Control and iii) PTSD- vs. Control. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies.
Out of 2939 titles and abstracts, 13 studies were eligible for data extraction. As compared to PTSD- civilian survivors of war, PTSD+ civilian survivors of war demonstrated significant deficits on TMT-A, TMT-B, Digit span backward, explicit memory low pair associate, CVLT recognition, WAIS-verbal and non-verbal tests. As compared to health controls, PTSD+ survivors demonstrated significantly lower performance on explicit memory low pair and high associate, RAVLT immediate and delayed recall, CVLT delayed and short cued recall. Performance on the neuropsychological test between PTSD- survivors of war and controls was not significant for all tests.
The pattern suggests that PTSD+ survivors of war had poorer performance in tasks requiring processing speed, executive function, attention, working memory and learning. The magnitude of the cognitive deficits in our pooled analysis was small to moderate depending on the neuropsychological test. Most of our pooled analysis suffered from a high risk of bias, which lowered the confidence in our results.
我们对战后创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)老年幸存者进行了一项荟萃分析和系统评价,以根据个体神经心理学测试评估他们认知障碍的变异性。
我们纳入了探索战争中老年PTSD平民幸存者(年龄>60岁)认知缺陷关联的病例对照研究,使用从创刊至2018年1月的MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO数据库。我们在三组比较中对比了认知表现:i)PTSD+与PTSD-战争平民幸存者;ii)PTSD+与对照组;iii)PTSD-与对照组。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对病例对照研究的偏倚风险进行评估。
在2939篇标题和摘要中,13项研究符合数据提取条件。与PTSD-战争平民幸存者相比,PTSD+战争平民幸存者在数字符号替换测验A、数字符号替换测验B、倒背数字、外显记忆低对联想、加利福尼亚语言学习测验识别、韦氏成人智力量表言语和非言语测试中表现出显著缺陷。与健康对照组相比,PTSD+幸存者在外显记忆低对和高联想、雷伊听觉词语学习测验即时和延迟回忆、加利福尼亚语言学习测验延迟和短线索回忆方面表现显著较差。PTSD-战争幸存者与对照组之间的神经心理学测试表现对于所有测试均无显著差异。
该模式表明,PTSD+战争幸存者在需要处理速度、执行功能、注意力、工作记忆和学习的任务中表现较差。根据神经心理学测试,我们汇总分析中认知缺陷的程度为小到中度。我们的大多数汇总分析存在高偏倚风险,这降低了我们对结果的信心。