Grégory Jules, Créquit Perrine, Vilgrain Valérie, Boutron Isabelle, Ronot Maxime
INSERM, UMR1153, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), METHODS team, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
JHEP Rep. 2020 Oct 16;3(1):100196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100196. eCollection 2021 Feb.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In 2005, the registration of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) before enrolment of participants became a condition for publication by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors to increase transparency in trial reporting. Among RCTs on transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) published after 2007, we assess the proportion that were registered and compare registered primary outcomes (PO) with those reported in publications to determine whether primary outcome reporting bias favoured significant outcomes.
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports of RCTs evaluating TACE for HCC treatment between 1 September 2007 and 31 March 2018. Registration and publication information for each included RCT was compared using a standardised data extraction form.
Thirteen out of 53 (25%) included RCTs were correctly registered ( before the starting date of the RCT), 14 (26%) were registered after the RCT starting date, and 26 (49%) were not registered. Six out of 14 of the retrospectively registered RCTs (43%) were registered after their completion date. The PO was clearly reported in the published article of all registered RCTs, whereas the report was not clear in 8/26 (31%) of the non-registered RCTs ( = 0.01). Among registered RCTs, 8/27 (30%) had major discrepancies between registered and published PO. The influence of these discrepancies could be assessed in 6 of them and was shown to statistically favour significant results in 2.
Registration and outcome reporting in RCTs on TACE for HCC are often inadequate. Registration should be reinforced because it is a key to transparency.
Trial registration is fundamental to our understanding and interpretation of results, as it provides information on all relevant clinical trials (to place the results in a broader context), and on the details of their associated protocols (to ensure that the scientific plan is followed). Once a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is completed, the trial results are usually publicly shared via scientific articles that are expected to thoroughly and objectively report them. This study shows that half of the RCTs evaluating transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma were not registered, and identified major discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome favouring significant results.
2005年,所有随机对照试验(RCT)在招募参与者之前进行注册成为医学期刊编辑国际委员会规定的论文发表条件,以提高试验报告的透明度。在2007年后发表的关于经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的随机对照试验中,我们评估已注册试验的比例,并比较注册的主要结局(PO)与发表文章中报告的结局,以确定主要结局报告偏倚是否有利于显著结局。
我们检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE,以获取2007年9月1日至2018年3月31日期间评估TACE治疗HCC的随机对照试验报告。使用标准化数据提取表比较每个纳入的随机对照试验的注册和发表信息。
53项纳入的随机对照试验中,13项(25%)正确注册(在随机对照试验开始日期之前),14项(26%)在随机对照试验开始日期之后注册,26项(49%)未注册。14项回顾性注册的随机对照试验中有6项(43%)在完成日期之后注册。所有注册随机对照试验的发表文章中均明确报告了主要结局,而26项未注册的随机对照试验中有8项(31%)报告不明确(P = 0.01)。在注册的随机对照试验中,27项中有8项(30%)注册的主要结局与发表的主要结局存在重大差异。其中6项可评估这些差异的影响,结果显示有2项在统计学上有利于显著结果。
关于TACE治疗HCC的随机对照试验的注册和结局报告往往不充分。应加强注册,因为这是提高透明度的关键。
试验注册对于我们理解和解释结果至关重要,因为它提供了所有相关临床试验的信息(以便将结果置于更广泛的背景中)以及相关方案的详细信息(以确保遵循科学计划)。一旦完成随机对照试验(RCT),试验结果通常会通过科学文章公开共享,这些文章应全面、客观地报告结果。本研究表明,评估经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照试验中有一半未注册,并发现注册的主要结局与发表的主要结局之间存在有利于显著结果的重大差异。