Suppr超能文献

通用底胶预处理对实验性两步法自酸蚀粘结系统粘结效果的影响。

Influence of a Primer Resembling Universal Adhesive on the Bonding Effectiveness of an Experimental Two-step Self-etch Adhesive.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):635-646. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45519.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of application of a primer resembling a universal adhesive with or without light irradiation followed by a hydrophobic bonding agent on bonding effectiveness, based on shear bond strength (SBS) and shear fatigue strength (SFS) tests. Materials and Methods: An experimental two-step self-etch adhesive (BZF) that comprises a primer resembling a universal adhesive (BZP) and a hydrophobic bonding agent (BZB) were used. The two-step self-etch adhesive, Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE), served as a comparison. Three experiments were conducted. Experiment 1: (1) BZP alone without light irradiation (BZP w/o); (2) BZP alone with light irradiation (BZP w/); (3) BZP without light irradiation followed by BZB (BZPB w/o); (4) BZP with light irradiation followed by BZB (BZPB w/). Experiment 2: (1) BZPB w/o, (2) SE primer + BZ bonding agent (SEP + BZB), and (3) SE primer + SE bonding agent (SEPB). The bonded specimens of experiment 1 and 2 were subjected to SBS tests. Experiment 3: Bonded specimens following the same experimental protocol as experiment 2 were subjected to SFS tests. Results: BZPB showed significantly higher mean enamel and dentin SBS than did BZP. BZPB showed significantly higher SBS without light irradiation than with light irradiation to both substrates. The group of BZPB without light irradiation showed significantly higher SBS than the group of BZPB with light irradiation to both substrates. For experiments 2 and 3, although no significant differences were found in SBS among groups for enamel, SEP + BZB showed a significantly lower SBS and SFS than other groups for dentin. Conclusions: BZF showed bonding performance equivalent to that of the gold standard Clearfil SE Bond 2.

摘要

目的

通过剪切结合强度(SBS)和剪切疲劳强度(SFS)测试,研究应用类似于通用粘结剂的底涂剂并结合光照射,随后使用疏水性粘结剂对粘结效果的影响。

材料与方法

使用一种两步自酸蚀粘结剂(BZF),其中包括一种类似于通用粘结剂的底涂剂(BZP)和疏水性粘结剂(BZB)。将 Clearfil SE Bond 2(SE)作为比较组。进行了三个实验。实验 1:(1)单独使用底涂剂但不进行光照(BZP w/o);(2)单独使用底涂剂并进行光照(BZP w/);(3)不进行光照随后使用粘结剂(BZPB w/o);(4)进行光照随后使用粘结剂(BZPB w/)。实验 2:(1)BZPB w/o;(2)SE 底涂剂+BZ 粘结剂(SEP + BZB);(3)SE 底涂剂+SE 粘结剂(SEPB)。对实验 1 和 2 的粘结样本进行 SBS 测试。实验 3:按照与实验 2 相同的实验方案对粘结样本进行 SFS 测试。

结果

BZPB 对牙釉质和牙本质的平均 SBS 显著高于 BZP。BZPB 在两种基质不进行光照的情况下显示出比进行光照时更高的 SBS。不进行光照的 BZPB 组比两种基质都进行光照的 BZPB 组具有更高的 SBS。对于实验 2 和 3,尽管牙釉质的各组 SBS 之间没有显著差异,但 SEP + BZB 对牙本质的 SBS 和 SFS 显著低于其他组。

结论

BZF 表现出与金标准 Clearfil SE Bond 2 相当的粘结性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验