Kim Hye Bin, Kweon Tae Dong, Chang Chul Ho, Kim Ji Young, Kim Kyung Sub, Kim Ji Young
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Aug 15;46(16):E852-E858. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003957.
A prospective randomized double-blinded study.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two different ventilator modes (inspiratory to expiratory ratio [I:E ratio] of 1:1 and 1:2) on intraoperative surgical bleeding in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.
During PLIF surgery, a considerable amount of blood loss is anticipated. In the prone position, engorgement of the vertebral vein increases surgical bleeding. We hypothesized that equal ratio ventilation (ERV) with I:E ratio of 1:1 would lower peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) in the prone position and consequentially decrease surgical bleeding.
Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERV (ERV group, n = 14) or conventional ventilation with I:E ratio of 1:2 (control group, n = 14). Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were measured at 5 minutes after anesthesia induction, at 5 minutes after the prone position, at the time of skin closure, and at 5 minutes after turning to the supine position.
The amount of intraoperative surgical bleeding in the ERV group was significantly less than that in the control group (975.7 ± 349.9 mL vs. 1757.1 ± 1172.7 mL, P = 0.030). Among other hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, PIP and plateau inspiratory pressure (Pplat) were significantly lower and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) was significantly higher in the ERV group than those of the control group throughout the study period, respectively (all P < 0.05).
Compared to conventional ratio ventilation, ERV provided lower PIP and reduced intraoperative surgical blood loss in patients undergoing PLIF surgery.Level of Evidence: 2.
一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
本研究旨在比较两种不同通气模式(吸气与呼气比[I:E比]为1:1和1:2)对接受后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)患者术中手术出血的影响。
在PLIF手术期间,预计会有大量失血。在俯卧位时,椎静脉充血会增加手术出血。我们假设I:E比为1:1的等比通气(ERV)会降低俯卧位时的吸气峰压(PIP),从而减少手术出血。
28例患者被随机分配接受ERV(ERV组,n = 14)或I:E比为1:2的传统通气(对照组,n = 14)。在麻醉诱导后5分钟、俯卧位后5分钟、皮肤缝合时以及转为仰卧位后5分钟测量血流动力学和呼吸参数。
ERV组术中手术出血量明显少于对照组(975.7±349.9 mL对1757.1±1172.7 mL,P = 0.030)。在其他血流动力学和呼吸参数中,在整个研究期间,ERV组的PIP和吸气平台压(Pplat)明显低于对照组,动态肺顺应性(Cdyn)明显高于对照组(所有P < 0.05)。
与传统比例通气相比,ERV在接受PLIF手术的患者中提供了更低的PIP并减少了术中手术出血量。证据水平:2。