Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, PO Box 300, 1714, Grålum, Norway.
Institute for Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):100-108. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08242-8. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
The impact of the position of the middle colic artery (MCA) bifurcation and the trajectory of the accessory MCA (aMCA) on adequate lymphadenectomy when operating colon cancer have as of yet not been described and/or analysed in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the MCA bifurcation position to anatomical landmarks and to assess the trajectory of aMCA.
The colonic vascular anatomy was manually reconstructed in 3D from high-resolution CT datasets using Osirix MD and 3-matic Medical and analysed. CT datasets were exported as STL files and supplemented with 3D printed models when required.
Thirty-two datasets were analysed. The MCA bifurcation was left to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in 4 (12.1%), in front of SMV in 17 (53.1%) and right to SMV in 11 (34.4%) models. Median distances from the MCA origin to bifurcation were 3.21 (1.18-15.60) cm. A longer MCA bifurcated over or right to SMV, while a shorter bifurcated left to SMV (r = 0.457, p = 0.009). The main MCA direction was towards right in 19 (59.4%) models. When initial directions included left, the bifurcation occurred left to or anterior to SMV in all models. When the initial directions included right, the bifurcation occurred anterior or right to SMV in all models. The aMCA was found in 10 (31.3%) models, following the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) in 5 near the lower pancreatic border. The IMV confluence was into SMV in 18 (56.3%), splenic vein in 11 (34.4%) and jejunal vein in 3 (9.4%) models.
Awareness of the wide range of MCA bifurcation positions reported is crucial for the quality of lymphadenectomy performed. The aMCA occurs in 31.3% models and its trajectory is in proximity to the lower pancreatic border in one half of models, indicating that it needs to be considered when operating splenic flexure cancer.
中结肠动脉(MCA)分叉的位置和副 MCA(aMCA)的轨迹对结肠癌手术时进行充分的淋巴结清扫的影响尚未在文献中进行描述和/或分析。本研究的目的是确定 MCA 分叉位置与解剖学标志,并评估 aMCA 的轨迹。
使用 Osirix MD 和 3-matic Medical 从高分辨率 CT 数据集手动重建结肠血管解剖结构,并进行三维重建,然后进行分析。将 CT 数据集导出为 STL 文件,并在需要时补充 3D 打印模型。
分析了 32 个数据集。MCA 分叉在 4 个模型中位于肠系膜上静脉(SMV)左侧(12.1%),在 17 个模型中位于 SMV 前方(53.1%),在 11 个模型中位于 SMV 右侧(34.4%)。MCA 起点到分叉的中位数距离为 3.21(1.18-15.60)cm。MCA 分叉越长,越偏向 SMV 上方或右侧,而分叉越短,越偏向 SMV 左侧(r=0.457,p=0.009)。19 个模型(59.4%)中 MCA 的主要方向朝向右侧。当初始方向包括左侧时,所有模型的 MCA 分叉均位于 SMV 左侧或前方。当初始方向包括右侧时,所有模型的 MCA 分叉均位于 SMV 前方或右侧。10 个模型(31.3%)中发现了 aMCA,其中 5 个在靠近胰腺下缘的肠系膜下静脉(IMV)附近。IMV 汇流进入 SMV 的有 18 个模型(56.3%),进入脾静脉的有 11 个模型(34.4%),进入空肠静脉的有 3 个模型(9.4%)。
认识到报道的 MCA 分叉位置范围广泛对于提高淋巴结清扫的质量至关重要。aMCA 在 31.3%的模型中出现,其轨迹在一半的模型中靠近胰腺下缘,这表明在进行脾曲癌手术时需要考虑到它。