Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 25;16(1):e0245930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245930. eCollection 2021.
In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data.
This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm3 volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm3; BTTS5, 0.24 cm3). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers.
Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88-0.92 and 0.92-0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001-0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89-0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76-0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10-15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4-5 (19-39 sec).
The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm3 is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice.
在乳腺弥散加权成像(DWI)方案标准化中,最近表明没有一种乳腺肿瘤组织选择(BTTS)方法优于其他方法。本研究的目的是分析三种基于重复性、准确性和时间测量的固定大小乳腺肿瘤组织选择(BTTS)方法的可行性,与乳腺弥散加权成像数据中的最大椭圆形和手动描绘相比。
本研究采用了一项连续的数据集,共 116 个至少 1.0cm 的乳腺病变(98 个恶性),根据 EUSOBI 乳腺 DWI 工作组的建议进行扫描。比较了两种最大尺寸手动(BTTS1)和最大尺寸圆形/椭圆形(BTTS2)方法的重复性,以及三种更小的固定大小圆形 BTTS 方法在每个病变的中间(BTTS3,0.12cm3 体积)和最低表观扩散系数(ADC)(BTTS4,0.12cm3;BTTS5,0.24cm3)。由两位观察者评估 5 种 BTTS 方法的平均 ADC 值、组内相关系数(ICC)、曲线下面积(AUC)和测量时间(sec)。
任何 BTTS 方法的观察者间和观察者内的一致性都非常好(ICC 分别为 0.88-0.92 和 0.92-0.94)。任何两对 BTTS 方法之间的 ADCmean 差异均有统计学意义(p=0.001-0.009),但观察者 1 中 BTTS2 与 BTTS3 之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.10)。BTTS 方法的 AUC 相当,其中 BTTS2 的 AUC 最高(0.89-0.91),BTTS4 的 AUC 最低(0.76-0.85)。然而,作为临床可行性的指标,BTTS2-3 与 BTTS1、4-5 相比,测量 ADC 时间最短(10-15 秒)。
作为临床决策的潜在工具,固定大小 BTTS 方法的性能具有相等的 AUC,但与手动或整个病变的椭圆形测量相比,ADC 测量时间更短。固定大小 BTTS 方法的优势在于具有极好的可重复性。对于临床实践,使用 0.12cm3 的中心固定乳腺肿瘤组织体积是最可行的方法。