Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University.
Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Sep 1;60(9):4291-4297. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab003.
The ability to identify lupus patients in high disease activity status (HDAS) without knowledge of the SLEDAI could have application in selection of patients for treatment escalation or enrolment in trials. We sought to generate an algorithm that could calculate via model fitting the presence of HDAS using simple demographic and laboratory values.
We examined the association of high disease activity (HDA) with demographic and laboratory parameters using prospectively collected data. An HDA visit is recorded when SLEDAI-2K ≥10. We utilized the use of combinatorial search to find algorithms to build a mathematical model predictive of HDA. Performance of each algorithm was evaluated using multi-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the final model was compared with the naïve Bayes classifier, and analysed using the confusion matrix for accuracy and misclassification rate.
Data on 286 patients, followed for a median of 5.1 years were studied for a total of 5680 visits. Sixteen laboratory parameters were found to be significantly associated with HDA. A total of 216 algorithms were evaluated and the final algorithm chosen was based on seven pathology measures and three demographic variables. It has an accuracy of 88.6% and misclassification rate of 11.4%. When compared with the naïve Bayes classifier [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.663], our algorithm has a better accuracy with AUC = 0.829.
This study shows that building an accurate model to calculate HDA using routinely available clinical parameters is feasible. Future studies to independently validate the algorithm will be needed to confirm its predictive performance.
在不了解 SLEDAI 的情况下,能够识别狼疮患者的高疾病活动状态(HDAS)可能适用于选择需要治疗升级或参加试验的患者。我们试图生成一种算法,该算法可以通过模型拟合来计算使用简单的人口统计学和实验室值来确定 HDAS 的存在。
我们使用前瞻性收集的数据检查了高疾病活动(HDA)与人口统计学和实验室参数之间的关联。当 SLEDAI-2K≥10 时,会记录 HDA 就诊。我们利用组合搜索来寻找构建预测 HDA 的数学模型的算法。使用多类接受者操作特征曲线下的面积来评估每个算法的性能,并将最终模型与朴素贝叶斯分类器进行比较,并使用混淆矩阵进行准确性和错误分类率分析。
研究了 286 名患者的数据,中位随访时间为 5.1 年,共进行了 5680 次就诊。发现 16 个实验室参数与 HDA 显著相关。共评估了 216 个算法,最终选择的算法基于 7 个病理指标和 3 个人口统计学变量。它的准确性为 88.6%,错误分类率为 11.4%。与朴素贝叶斯分类器相比[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.663],我们的算法具有更好的准确性,AUC=0.829。
这项研究表明,使用常规临床参数构建准确的模型来计算 HDA 是可行的。需要进行独立验证算法的未来研究,以确认其预测性能。