Institute of Sport, Tourism, and Service, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia; Motor Action Research Group (GIAM).
Human Behavior Laboratory, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Physiol Behav. 2021 Apr 1;232:113329. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113329. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Identifying performance indicators in professional boxing trough T-pattern analysis (TPA) was a priority objective of the present study. We accessed data through the boxrec.com portal, where 15 boxing fights were selected. All these fights concluded in the first or second round and belonged to champions (lb. for lb.) of international organizations recognized in professional boxing. The boxers' interactive decisions were approached through an observational methodology. For the conformation and behavioral record, a mixed registration system was agreed upon by two former exprofessional boxers. The data were analyzed through Theme (TPA) to reveal differences relating to the outcome (Winner vs Loser), in terms of temporal regularities and number of occurrences through Chi-square (χ2). More percentages of individual T-Patterns were found in winners than in losers, and winning boxers showed greater decisional complexity than the losers. However, these differences between both groups of boxers were not supported by Chi-square (χ2).
通过 T 模式分析(TPA)确定职业拳击的绩效指标是本研究的首要目标。我们通过 boxrec.com 门户获取数据,其中选择了 15 场拳击比赛。所有这些比赛都在第一回合或第二回合结束,属于职业拳击国际组织认可的冠军(磅对磅)。通过观察方法研究拳击手的互动决策。对于 conformation 和行为记录,两名前职业拳击手同意采用混合登记制度。通过主题(TPA)分析数据,以揭示与结果(胜者与败者)相关的时间规律和出现次数的差异,采用卡方(χ2)检验。胜者的个体 T 模式出现的百分比高于败者,而胜者的决策复杂性大于败者。然而,这些差异并没有通过卡方(χ2)得到支持。