Depressive symptoms, childhood maltreatment, and allostatic load: The importance of sex differences.

OBJECTIVE

Roughly half the individuals who experience childhood maltreatment also experience depressive symptoms in adulthood; however, many current treatments are ineffective. Allostatic load (AL) offers a method of exploring this relationship through the lens of biometric dysregulation that may explain these increased odds for depressive symptoms in adulthood. We attempted to expand the limited research base on AL, depressive symptoms, and childhood maltreatment by examining how these variables are associated in a U.S. community sample.

METHOD

Data were acquired through secondary analysis of the Midlife in the United States Refresher biomarker survey (n = 691). Depression severity, measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, served as the dependent variable, while summed scores for the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, and a 16 measure AL index served as independent variables. All analyses were stratified by sex (n male = 347, n female = 344). The Perceived Stress Scale was included to control for recent stress. An OLS regression was used to understand the relationship between depression and predictor variables before then being tested for the possible mediating role of AL.

RESULTS

Comparison of OLS models yielded notable differences in predicting depressive symptoms between males and females, namely that while maltreatment was significant for both groups, AL was only significant for females. Mediation by allostatic load was not significant for males or females.

CONCLUSION

We explored the possible mediation of childhood maltreatment and adulthood depressive symptoms by AL. While our study did not confirm mediation, this was the first known study to explore these relationships in a U.S., community sample. Sex stratification reveals a clear need for accounting for sex differences in predictor variables for future studies.