Wang Yuhao, Liu Yuxuan, Tian Susu, Hu Xinyi, Tian Jiayi, Wang Yingxue, Wang Yihan, Miao Chunxia, Wang Wei
School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, 209 Tong Shan Road, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Public Health, The Affiliated Xuzhou Oriental Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, Xuzhou, China.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Jun 14;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00931-3.
Numerous studies have found a strong correlation between emotional abuse in childhood and aggressive behavior in adolescents, especially among rural youth. However, the complex relationship between the different sub-dimensions of aggression and emotional abuse is unclear. This study aimed to explore the association between emotional abuse and different dimensions of aggressive behavior in rural adolescents using network analysis.
The participants in this study came from multiple middle schools and a total of 1797 adolescents were included in the study. Questionnaires were self-reported using the CTQ-SF (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form) scale and Buss and Warren aggression questionnaire. A network analysis was performed.
The network analysis revealed that hostility and anger were the most central dimensions of aggression, with " Sometimes I feel like people are laughing at me behind my back " and " I have a hard time controlling my temper " being the most influential nodes. Emotional abuse symptoms, particularly “Someone in my family has said insulting or sad things to me,” served as critical bridge symptoms, linking emotional abuse to aggressive behavior. Gender differences were significant, with males exhibiting stronger associations between emotional abuse and physical aggression, while females showed stronger links between emotional abuse and internalizing symptoms like hostility and anger.
This study highlights the central role of hostility and anger in the relationship between emotional abuse and aggressive behavior among rural adolescents. Poor family relationships, particularly insulting or demeaning remarks from family members, were identified as key bridge symptoms that exacerbate aggressive tendencies. Gender-specific patterns suggest that interventions should be tailored to address physical aggression in males and internalizing symptoms in females.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13034-025-00931-3.
大量研究发现,童年期情感虐待与青少年的攻击行为之间存在密切关联,尤其是在农村青少年中。然而,攻击行为的不同子维度与情感虐待之间的复杂关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过网络分析探讨农村青少年情感虐待与攻击行为不同维度之间的关联。
本研究的参与者来自多所中学,共纳入1797名青少年。使用儿童创伤问卷简版(CTQ-SF)量表和巴斯与沃伦攻击问卷进行自我报告问卷调查。进行了网络分析。
网络分析显示,敌意和愤怒是攻击行为最核心的维度,“有时我觉得人们在背后嘲笑我”和“我很难控制自己的脾气”是最具影响力的节点。情感虐待症状,特别是“我家里有人对我说过侮辱性或伤人的话”,是关键的桥梁症状,将情感虐待与攻击行为联系起来。性别差异显著,男性在情感虐待与身体攻击之间的关联更强,而女性在情感虐待与敌意和愤怒等内化症状之间的联系更强。
本研究强调了敌意和愤怒在农村青少年情感虐待与攻击行为关系中的核心作用。不良的家庭关系,特别是家庭成员的侮辱性或贬低性言论,被确定为加剧攻击倾向的关键桥梁症状。特定性别的模式表明,干预措施应针对男性的身体攻击和女性的内化症状进行调整。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s13034-025-00931-3获取的补充材料。