Iskandar Katia, Rizk Rana, Matta Roula, Husni-Samaha Rola, Sacre Hala, Bouraad Etwal, Dirani Natalia, Salameh Pascale, Molinier Laurent, Roques Christine, Dimassi Ahmad, Hallit Souheil, Abdo Rachel, Hanna Pierre Abi, Yared Yasmina, Matta Matta, Mostafa Inas
Department of Mathématiques Informatique et Télécommunications, Université Toulouse III, Paul Sabatier, INSERM, UMR, Toulouse, France; INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 Jan 22;24:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.01.006.
The rising incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) attributable to Escherichia coli resistant isolates is becoming a serious public health concern. Although global rates of infection vary considerably by region, the growing prevalence of this uropathogen has been associated with a high economic burden and health strain. This study aims: (1) to estimate the differences in clinical and economic outcomes between 2 groups of adult hospitalized patients with UTIs from E. coli resistant and susceptible bacteria and (2) to investigate drivers of this cost from a payer's perspective.
A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 hospitals in Lebanon. The cost analysis followed a bottom-up microcosting approach; a linear regression was constructed to evaluate the predictors of hospitalization costs and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the impact of resistance on length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality.
Out of 467 inpatients, 250 cases were because of resistant E. coli isolates. Results showed that patients with resistant uropathogens had 29% higher mean total hospitalization costs ($3429 vs $2651; P = .004), and an extended median LOS (6 days vs 5 days; P = .020) compared with susceptible cohorts. The selection of resistant bacteria and the Charlson comorbidity index predicted higher total hospitalization costs and in-hospital mortality.
In an era of increased pressure for cost containment, this study showed the burden of treating UTIs resulting from resistant bacteria. The results can inform cost-effectiveness analyses that intend to evaluate the benefit of a national action plan aimed at decreasing the impact of antibiotic resistance.
由耐大肠杆菌分离株引起的尿路感染(UTIs)发病率不断上升,正成为一个严重的公共卫生问题。尽管全球感染率因地区而异,但这种尿路致病菌的日益流行与高昂的经济负担和健康压力相关。本研究旨在:(1)估计两组因耐大肠杆菌和敏感细菌引起UTIs的成年住院患者在临床和经济结果上的差异,以及(2)从支付方的角度调查这种成本的驱动因素。
在黎巴嫩的10家医院进行了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。成本分析采用自下而上的微观成本核算方法;构建线性回归以评估住院成本的预测因素,并使用Cox比例风险模型估计耐药性对住院时间(LOS)和院内死亡率的影响。
在467名住院患者中,250例是由耐大肠杆菌分离株引起的。结果显示,与敏感队列相比,尿路致病菌耐药的患者平均总住院成本高29%(3429美元对2651美元;P = .004),中位住院时间延长(6天对5天;P = .020)。耐药菌的选择和Charlson合并症指数预测了更高的总住院成本和院内死亡率。
在成本控制压力增加的时代,本研究显示了治疗耐药菌引起的UTIs的负担。这些结果可为成本效益分析提供参考,这些分析旨在评估旨在减少抗生素耐药性影响的国家行动计划的益处。