Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
TRICARE military beneficiaries are increasingly referred for major surgeries to civilian hospitals under "purchased care." This loss of volume may have a negative impact on the readiness of surgeons working in the "direct-care" setting at military treatment facilities and has important implications under the volume-quality paradigm. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of care source (direct versus purchased) and surgical volume on perioperative outcomes and costs of colorectal surgeries.
We examined TRICARE claims and medical records for 18- to 64-year-old patients undergoing major colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2015. We used a retrospective, weighted estimating equations analysis to assess differences in 30-day outcomes (mortality, readmissions, and major or minor complications) and costs (index and total including 30-day postsurgery) for colorectal surgery patients between purchased and direct care.
We included 20,317 patients, with 24.8% undergoing direct-care surgery. Mean length of stay was 7.6 vs 7.7 days for direct and purchased care, respectively (P = .24). Adjusted 30-day odds between care settings revealed that although hospital readmissions (odds ratio 1.40) were significantly higher in direct care, overall complications (odds ratio 1.05) were similar between the 2 settings. However, mean total costs between direct and purchased care differed ($55,833 vs $30,513, respectively). Within direct care, mean total costs ($50,341; 95% confidence interval $41,509-$59,173) were lower at very high-volume facilities compared to other facilities ($54,869; 95% confidence interval $47,822-$61,916).
Direct care was associated with higher odds of readmissions, similar overall complications, and higher costs. Contrary to common assumptions regarding volume and quality, higher volume in the direct-care setting was not associated with fewer complications.
随着“购买式服务”的推行,越来越多的 TRICARE 军队受益人被转往民用医院进行重大手术。这种业务量的流失可能会对在军事医疗机构“直接护理”环境中工作的外科医生的准备情况产生负面影响,并在数量-质量范式下产生重要影响。本研究的目的是评估护理来源(直接护理与购买式服务)和手术量对结直肠手术围手术期结果和成本的影响。
我们检查了 2006 年至 2015 年期间接受主要结直肠手术的 18 至 64 岁患者的 TRICARE 索赔和医疗记录。我们使用回顾性、加权估计方程分析来评估购买式服务和直接护理的结直肠手术患者在 30 天内的结果(死亡率、再入院率以及主要或次要并发症)和成本(指数和包括 30 天术后的总费用)差异。
我们纳入了 20317 名患者,其中 24.8%接受直接护理手术。直接护理和购买式服务的平均住院时间分别为 7.6 天和 7.7 天(P=0.24)。护理环境之间的调整后 30 天几率显示,尽管直接护理的医院再入院率(比值比 1.40)明显较高,但两种环境下的总体并发症(比值比 1.05)相似。然而,直接护理和购买式护理之间的平均总费用有所不同(分别为 55833 美元和 30513 美元)。在直接护理中,与其他设施相比,非常高容量设施的总平均费用(50341 美元;95%置信区间 41509 美元-59173 美元)较低(54869 美元;95%置信区间 47822 美元-61916 美元)。
直接护理与更高的再入院几率、相似的总体并发症和更高的成本相关。与关于数量和质量的常见假设相反,直接护理环境中的高容量与并发症减少无关。